Comparing CT perfusion with oxygen partial pressure in a rabbit VX2 soft-tissue tumor model

The aim of this study was to evaluate the oxygen partial pressure of the rabbit model of the VX2 tumor using a 64-slice perfusion CT and to compare the results with that obtained using the oxygen microelectrode method. Perfusion CT was performed for 45 successfully constructed rabbit models of a VX2...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of radiation research Vol. 55; no. 1; pp. 183 - 190
Main Authors Sun, Chang-Jin, Li, Chao, Lv, Hai-Bo, Zhao, Cong, Yu, Jin-Ming, Wang, Guang-Hui, Luo, Yun-Xiu, Li, Yan, Xiao, Mingyong, Yin, Jun, Lang, Jin-Yi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Oxford University Press 01.01.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The aim of this study was to evaluate the oxygen partial pressure of the rabbit model of the VX2 tumor using a 64-slice perfusion CT and to compare the results with that obtained using the oxygen microelectrode method. Perfusion CT was performed for 45 successfully constructed rabbit models of a VX2 brain tumor. The perfusion values of the brain tumor region of interest, the blood volume (BV), the time to peak (TTP) and the peak enhancement intensity (PEI) were measured. The results were compared with the partial pressure of oxygen (PO2) of that region of interest obtained using the oxygen microelectrode method. The perfusion values of the brain tumor region of interest in 45 successfully constructed rabbit models of a VX2 brain tumor ranged from 1.3–127.0 (average, 21.1 ± 26.7 ml/min/ml); BV ranged from 1.2–53.5 ml/100g (average, 22.2 ± 13.7 ml/100g); PEI ranged from 8.7–124.6 HU (average, 43.5 ± 28.7 HU); and TTP ranged from 8.2–62.3 s (average, 38.8 ± 14.8 s). The PO2 in the corresponding region ranged from 0.14–47 mmHg (average, 16 ± 14.8 mmHg). The perfusion CT positively correlated with the tumor PO2, which can be used for evaluating the tumor hypoxia in clinical practice.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
Chang-Jin Sun and Chao Li are co-first authors equally.
ISSN:0449-3060
1349-9157
1349-9157
DOI:10.1093/jrr/rrt092