Gut metabotypes govern health effects of dietary polyphenols

[Display omitted] ► Health effects of dietary polyphenols often depend on multiple metabolic processes. ► Gut metabotypes with specific polyphenol metabolism patterns can be differentiated. ► Physiologically achievable concentrations of relevant metabolites should be tested. ► Novel products and app...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCurrent opinion in biotechnology Vol. 24; no. 2; pp. 220 - 225
Main Authors Bolca, Selin, Van de Wiele, Tom, Possemiers, Sam
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 01.04.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:[Display omitted] ► Health effects of dietary polyphenols often depend on multiple metabolic processes. ► Gut metabotypes with specific polyphenol metabolism patterns can be differentiated. ► Physiologically achievable concentrations of relevant metabolites should be tested. ► Novel products and applications can exploit polyphenol–microbiota interactions. Polyphenols are thought to be responsible for some of the health effects conferred by a diet rich in fruit and vegetables. Both the formation of bioactive polyphenol-derived metabolites and the modulation of colonic microbiota contribute to these health benefits. Therefore, one cannot infer biological responses from dietary intake records without considering polyphenol–microbiota interactions. However, the latter are complex and subject to large interindividual variability, leading to different polyphenol-metabolizing phenotypes or ‘metabotypes’. Based on accurate measurements of intake, exposure and effect on carefully selected samples, the physiological relevance of dietary polyphenols can be evaluated for each metabotype. Ultimately, this will lead to predictive modeling and the development of (personalized) functional foods and other nutraceuticals with maximized health benefits.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2012.09.009
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0958-1669
1879-0429
1879-0429
DOI:10.1016/j.copbio.2012.09.009