Reliability and validity of a single-item physical activity measure for adolescents
Aims The aim of this study was to examine the test–retest reliability and concurrent validity of an adolescent single‐item physical activity measure by comparing it with the existing Oxford Physical Activity Questionnaire (OPAQ) and accelerometer output. Methods Participants were 123 adolescents (14...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of paediatrics and child health Vol. 51; no. 8; pp. 787 - 793 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Australia
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.08.2015
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Aims
The aim of this study was to examine the test–retest reliability and concurrent validity of an adolescent single‐item physical activity measure by comparing it with the existing Oxford Physical Activity Questionnaire (OPAQ) and accelerometer output.
Methods
Participants were 123 adolescents (14.7 ± 0.5 years) from three secondary schools in New South Wales, Australia. To determine reliability, participants completed both questionnaires on two occasions separated by 2 weeks. To assess validity, participants wore Actigraph GT3X+ accelerometers for a 7‐day monitoring period and completed both physical activity questionnaires. Bivariate correlations between self‐reported moderate‐to‐vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and accelerometer MVPA min/day were calculated.
Results
The single‐item (intra‐class correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.64–0.83, P < 0.001) ) and the OPAQ (ICC = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.69–0.86, P < 0.001) were both found to have moderate‐to‐strong reliability. Correlations between self‐reported and objectively measured MVPA were similar for the single‐item measure (r = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.24–0.63, P < 0.001) and the OPAQ (r = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.30–0.65, P < 0.001).
Conclusions
These findings suggest the single‐item measure can provide a reliable and valid assessment of youth physical activity. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ArticleID:JPC12836 Priority Research Centre of Physical Activity and Nutrition, University of Newcastle ark:/67375/WNG-9B514MJK-G istex:46DA2FC290B046EF979F686455B6433245FAD217 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
ISSN: | 1034-4810 1440-1754 1440-1754 |
DOI: | 10.1111/jpc.12836 |