Reliability and validity of a single-item physical activity measure for adolescents

Aims The aim of this study was to examine the test–retest reliability and concurrent validity of an adolescent single‐item physical activity measure by comparing it with the existing Oxford Physical Activity Questionnaire (OPAQ) and accelerometer output. Methods Participants were 123 adolescents (14...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of paediatrics and child health Vol. 51; no. 8; pp. 787 - 793
Main Authors Scott, Joseph J, Morgan, Philip J, Plotnikoff, Ronald C, Lubans, David R
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Australia Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.08.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Aims The aim of this study was to examine the test–retest reliability and concurrent validity of an adolescent single‐item physical activity measure by comparing it with the existing Oxford Physical Activity Questionnaire (OPAQ) and accelerometer output. Methods Participants were 123 adolescents (14.7 ± 0.5 years) from three secondary schools in New South Wales, Australia. To determine reliability, participants completed both questionnaires on two occasions separated by 2 weeks. To assess validity, participants wore Actigraph GT3X+ accelerometers for a 7‐day monitoring period and completed both physical activity questionnaires. Bivariate correlations between self‐reported moderate‐to‐vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and accelerometer MVPA min/day were calculated. Results The single‐item (intra‐class correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.64–0.83, P < 0.001) ) and the OPAQ (ICC = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.69–0.86, P < 0.001) were both found to have moderate‐to‐strong reliability. Correlations between self‐reported and objectively measured MVPA were similar for the single‐item measure (r = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.24–0.63, P < 0.001) and the OPAQ (r = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.30–0.65, P < 0.001). Conclusions These findings suggest the single‐item measure can provide a reliable and valid assessment of youth physical activity.
Bibliography:ArticleID:JPC12836
Priority Research Centre of Physical Activity and Nutrition, University of Newcastle
ark:/67375/WNG-9B514MJK-G
istex:46DA2FC290B046EF979F686455B6433245FAD217
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:1034-4810
1440-1754
1440-1754
DOI:10.1111/jpc.12836