Efficacy and Safety of Once-Daily Insulin Degludec/Insulin Aspart versus Insulin Glargine (U100) for 52 Weeks in Insulin-Naïve Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The efficacy and safety of insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) once daily (OD) compared with insulin glargine U100 (IGlar) OD over 52 weeks in insulin-naïve adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) was investigated. In this open-label, parallel-group treat-to-target trial, participants were...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 11; no. 10; p. e0163350
Main Authors Kumar, Ajay, Franek, Edward, Wise, Jonathan, Niemeyer, Marcus, Mersebach, Henriette, Simó, Rafael
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 01.10.2016
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The efficacy and safety of insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) once daily (OD) compared with insulin glargine U100 (IGlar) OD over 52 weeks in insulin-naïve adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) was investigated. In this open-label, parallel-group treat-to-target trial, participants were randomized (1:1) to receive IDegAsp OD (breakfast, n = 266) or IGlar OD (as per label, n = 264). Participants then entered a 26-week extension phase (IDegAsp OD, n = 192; IGlar OD, n = 221). The primary endpoint was change from baseline to Week 26 in HbA1c. After 26 and 52 weeks, mean HbA1c decreased to similar levels in both groups. After 52 weeks, the mean estimated treatment difference was -0.08% (-0.26, 0.09 95%CI), confirming the non-inferiority of IDegAsp OD versus IGlar OD evaluated at Week 26. After 52 weeks, there was a similar reduction in mean fasting plasma glucose in both treatment groups. The rate of confirmed hypoglycemic episodes was 86% higher (p < 0.0001) whereas the rate of nocturnal hypoglycemia was 75% lower (p < 0.0001) for IDegAsp versus IGlar. Nocturnal-confirmed hypoglycemia was higher with IGlar whereas overall and diurnal hypoglycemia were higher with IDegAsp dosed at breakfast. These results highlight the importance of administration of IDegAsp with the main meal of the day, tailored to the individual patient's needs. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01045707 [core]) and NCT01169766 [ext].
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
Writing – original draft: AK EF JW MN HM RS. Writing – review & editing: AK EF JW MN HM RS.
Competing Interests: I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: AK served as adviser and was involved in speaker bureaus for Astra, Eli Lilly, Johnson & Johnson, MSD, Novartis and Novo Nordisk; and received research support from Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Johnson & Johnson, MSD, Novo Nordisk and Takeda. EF served as adviser to Novartis and Novo Nordisk and was involved in speaker bureaus for AstraZeneca/BMS, Bioton, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier and TEVA. JW was self-employed and served as adviser to AstraZeneca in 2014, was endocrine consultant for several hospitals in the New Orleans area, received research support by several pharmaceutical companies including Novo Nordisk, and was involved in speaker bureaus for AstraZeneca, Janssen Cilag and Sanofi. MN was an employee and shareholder for Novo Nordisk. HM was an employee and shareholder of Novo Nordisk. RS was a member of advisory boards for Lilly and Novo Nordisk. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0163350