A Bayesian Measure of the Probability of False Discovery in Genetic Epidemiology Studies
In light of the vast amounts of genomic data that are now being generated, we propose a new measure, the Bayesian false-discovery probability (BFDP), for assessing the noteworthiness of an observed association. BFDP shares the ease of calculation of the recently proposed false-positive report probab...
Saved in:
Published in | American journal of human genetics Vol. 81; no. 2; pp. 208 - 227 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Chicago, IL
Elsevier Inc
01.08.2007
University of Chicago Press Cell Press American Society of Human Genetics |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | In light of the vast amounts of genomic data that are now being generated, we propose a new measure, the Bayesian false-discovery probability (BFDP), for assessing the noteworthiness of an observed association. BFDP shares the ease of calculation of the recently proposed false-positive report probability (FPRP) but uses more information, has a noteworthy threshold defined naturally in terms of the costs of false discovery and nondiscovery, and has a sound methodological foundation. In addition, in a multiple-testing situation, it is straightforward to estimate the expected numbers of false discoveries and false nondiscoveries. We provide an in-depth discussion of FPRP, including a comparison with the
q value, and examine the empirical behavior of these measures, along with BFDP, via simulation. Finally, we use BFDP to assess the association between 131 single-nucleotide polymorphisms and lung cancer in a case-control study. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 This work was performed while on sabbatical at the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France. |
ISSN: | 0002-9297 1537-6605 |
DOI: | 10.1086/519024 |