An examination of the causes, consequences, and policy responses to the migration of highly trained health personnel from the Philippines: the high cost of living/leaving-a mixed method study

• Published in: Human resources for health Vol. 15; no. 1; p. 25
• Main Authors: Castro-Palaganas, Erlinda, Spitzer, Denise L, Kabamalan, Maria Midea M, Sanchez, Marian C, Caricativo, Ruel, Runnels, Vivien, Labonté, Ronald, Murphy, Gail Tomblin, Bourgeault, Ivy Lynn
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central 31.03.2017; BMC
• Subjects: Achievement tests; Attitude of Health Personnel; Brain drain; Decision making; Delivery of Health Care - economics; Delivery of Health Care - standards; Developing countries; Education, Professional; Emigration and Immigration; Ethics; Expenditures; Health care policy; Health Personnel; Health Policy; Health Services Accessibility; Health workers; Human resources; Human resources for health; Humans; Labor contracts; LDCs; Medical personnel; Medically Underserved Area; Midwifery; Migration; Mixed methods research; Motivation; Nurses; Nurses - supply & distribution; Nursing; Overseas employment; Philippines; Physical Therapists - supply & distribution; Physicians; Physicians - supply & distribution; Professional Practice Location; Recruitment; Retention; Rural Health Services; Rural Population; Stakeholders; Workers; Philippines; India; Human resources for health; Policy; Midwives; Physiotherapists; Physicians; Migration; Nurses; Philippines; Retention; Health workers
• ISSN: 1478-4491; 1478-4491
• DOI: 10.1186/s12960-017-0198-z

Dramatic increases in the migration of human resources for health (HRH) from developing countries like the Philippines can have consequences on the sustainability of health systems. In this paper, we trace the outflows of HRH from the Philippines, map out its key causes and consequences, and identify relevant policy responses. This mixed method study employed a decentered, comparative approach that involved three phases: (a) a scoping review on health workers' migration of relevant policy documents and academic literature on health workers' migration from the Philippines; and primary data collection with (b) 37 key stakeholders and (c) household surveys with seven doctors, 329 nurses, 66 midwives, and 18 physical therapists. Filipino health worker migration is best understood within the context of macro-, meso-, and micro-level factors that are situated within the political, economic, and historical/colonial legacy of the country. Underfunding of the health system and un- or underemployment were push factors for migration, as were concerns for security in the Philippines, the ability to practice to full scope or to have opportunities for career advancement. The migration of health workers has both negative and positive consequences for the Philippine health system and its health workers. Stakeholders focused on issues such as on brain drain, gain, and circulation, and on opportunities for knowledge and technology transfer. Concomitantly, migration has resulted in the loss of investment in human capital. The gap in the supply of health workers has affected the quality of care delivered, especially in rural areas. The opening of overseas opportunities has commercialized health education, compromised its quality, and stripped the country of skilled learning facilitators. The social cost of migration has affected émigrés and their families. At the household level, migration has engendered increased consumerism and materialism and fostered dependency on overseas remittances. Addressing these gaps requires time and resources. At the same time, migration is, however, seen by some as an opportunity for professional growth and enhancement, and as a window for drafting more effective national and inter-country policy responses to HRH mobility. Unless socioeconomic conditions are improved and health professionals are provided with better incentives, staying in the Philippines will not be a viable option. The massive expansion in education and training designed specifically for outmigration creates a domestic supply of health workers who cannot be absorbed by a system that is underfunded. This results in a paradox of underservice, especially in rural and remote areas, at the same time as underemployment and outmigration. Policy responses to this paradox have not yet been appropriately aligned to capture the multilayered and complex nature of these intersecting phenomena.