More than beliefs: Subject areas and teachers' integration of laptops in secondary teaching

This paper explores the relationship of subject areas to teachers' technology integration. Educational technology research has often identified 'culture clashes' to explain differences in technology use between subject areas. These clashes are frequently attributed to core features, v...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of educational technology Vol. 46; no. 2; pp. 360 - 369
Main Authors Howard, Sarah K., Chan, Amy, Caputi, Peter
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Coventry Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.03.2015
Wiley-Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This paper explores the relationship of subject areas to teachers' technology integration. Educational technology research has often identified 'culture clashes' to explain differences in technology use between subject areas. These clashes are frequently attributed to core features, values and beliefs held in the subject area cultures, but there has been little research analyzing the relationship between subject areas and integration. Using a validated path model as a conceptual framework, this paper presents an analysis of the relationship between three subject areas (English, Mathematics, Science) and known factors of teacher beliefs and readiness to use technology in teaching, which directly impact on secondary-level teachers' technology integration, over three years. Findings show that time and subject areas are both associated with teachers' readiness, but only subject areas are associated with teachers' beliefs. Implications for practice and future research are discussed. [Author abstract]
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-C2DHMZKM-9
istex:4F83349D2178389122CBC9A38BBE507BBC285932
ArticleID:BJET12139
New South Wales Department of Education and Communities
Refereed article. Includes bibliographical references.
British Journal of Educational Technology; v.46 n.2 p.360-369; March 2015
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0007-1013
1467-8535
DOI:10.1111/bjet.12139