Implementation of risk assessment and classification of pressure ulcers as quality indicators for patients with hip fractures

• The aims of the study were (i) to investigate the prevalence of pressure ulcers in patients with hip fracture, on arrival at a Swedish hospital, at discharge, and two weeks post‐surgery; (ii) to test whether clinical use of the Modified Norton Scale (MNS) could identify patients at risk for develo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of clinical nursing Vol. 8; no. 4; pp. 396 - 406
Main Authors GUNNINGBERG, LENA, LINDHOLM, CHRISTINA, CARLSSON, MARIANNE, SJÖdÉn, PER-OLOW
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford UK Blackwell Science Ltd 01.07.1999
Blackwell
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:• The aims of the study were (i) to investigate the prevalence of pressure ulcers in patients with hip fracture, on arrival at a Swedish hospital, at discharge, and two weeks post‐surgery; (ii) to test whether clinical use of the Modified Norton Scale (MNS) could identify patients at risk for development of pressure ulcers; and (iii) to compare the reported prevalence of pressure ulcer in the experimental group, where risk assessment and classification of pressure ulcers was performed on a daily basis, with that of the control group, where it was not. • The study design was prospective, with an experimental and a control group. The intervention in the experimental group consisted of risk assessment, risk alarm and skin observation performed by the nurse on duty, in the A & E Department, and daily throughout the hospital stay. • To facilitate the nurse's assessment, a `Pressure Ulcer Card' was developed, consisting of the MNS and descriptions of the four stages of pressure ulcers. • On arrival at the hospital, ≈20% of patients in both groups had pressure ulcers. At discharge, the rate had increased to 40% (experimental) and 36% (control). • Clinical use of the MNS made it possible to identify the majority of patients at risk for development of pressure ulcers. Patients who were confused on arrival developed significantly more pressure ulcers than patients who were orientated to time and place. • No significant difference was found in the reported prevalence of pressure ulcers between the experimental and control groups.
Bibliography:ArticleID:JOCN287
ark:/67375/WNG-F2SGBMBT-1
istex:1EDE479D63F8570C821CE9D67F590F892D8287B9
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0962-1067
1365-2702
1365-2702
DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2702.1999.00287.x