Exercising Body and Mind: An Integrated Approach to Functional Independence in Hospitalized Older People

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of a structured, multi‐component, early rehabilitation program on functional status, delirium, and discharge outcomes of older acute medical inpatients. DESIGN: Prospective controlled trial with blinded outcome evaluation. SETTING: Internal medicine service of a me...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) Vol. 56; no. 4; pp. 630 - 635
Main Authors Mudge, Alison M., Giebel, Andrea J., Cutler, Alison J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Malden, USA Blackwell Publishing Inc 01.04.2008
Blackwell
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of a structured, multi‐component, early rehabilitation program on functional status, delirium, and discharge outcomes of older acute medical inpatients. DESIGN: Prospective controlled trial with blinded outcome evaluation. SETTING: Internal medicine service of a metropolitan tertiary teaching hospital in Brisbane, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred twenty‐four consecutive inpatients aged 65 and older admitted from the emergency department to control or intervention medical ward. Exclusions included patients completely dependent before admission or admitted from a nursing home, patients too ill to participate or terminally ill, and patients with length of stay less than 72 hours. INTERVENTION: Early physiotherapy review with provision of an individualized graduated exercise program and activity diary, progressive encouragement of functional independence by nursing staff and other members of the multidisciplinary team, and cognitive stimulation sessions. MEASUREMENTS: Modified Barthel Index (MBI) at admission and discharge, timed up‐and‐go at admission and discharge, incidence of delirium and falls, measured activity, length of hospital stay, discharge destination, 30‐day readmission rate. RESULTS: Intervention and control participants were well matched in terms of age, sex, diagnosis, and functional status. The intervention group had greater improvement in functional status than the control group, with a median MBI improvement of 8.5 versus 3.5 points (P=.03). In the intervention group, there was a reduction in delirium (19.4% vs 35.5%, P=.04) and a trend to reduced falls (4.8% vs 11.3%, P=.19). Length of stay, timed up‐and‐go, discharge destination, and readmissions did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSION: This intervention was effective in improving function in a vulnerable patient group.
Bibliography:istex:B69A209F6B1BBCF422DAB75128FEC73FF2B5ED03
ark:/67375/WNG-898ZZLQ7-5
ArticleID:JGS1607
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0002-8614
1532-5415
DOI:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01607.x