Structure-relaxation mechanism for the response of T4 lysozyme cavity mutants to hydrostatic pressure

Significance High pressure has emerged as a powerful tool for exploring the energy landscape of proteins, but structural origins of the pressure response remain controversial. The results of this study on a cavity mutant of T4 lysozyme (L99A) provide direct evidence for a structure-relaxation mechan...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 112; no. 19; pp. E2437 - E2446
Main Authors Lerch, Michael T., López, Carlos J., Yang, Zhongyu, Kreitman, Margaux J., Horwitz, Joseph, Hubbell, Wayne L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States National Academy of Sciences 12.05.2015
National Acad Sciences
SeriesPNAS Plus
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Significance High pressure has emerged as a powerful tool for exploring the energy landscape of proteins, but structural origins of the pressure response remain controversial. The results of this study on a cavity mutant of T4 lysozyme (L99A) provide direct evidence for a structure-relaxation mechanism wherein pressure shifts conformational equilibria toward states with alternative packing arrangements that fill cavities or voids in the core. Both structure relaxation and cavity hydration can occur in response to pressure, and which dominates is found to depend on details of the energy landscape. The results also address conflicting views regarding the pressure response of L99A that have recently been published. Application of hydrostatic pressure shifts protein conformational equilibria in a direction to reduce the volume of the system. A current view is that the volume reduction is dominated by elimination of voids or cavities in the protein interior via cavity hydration, although an alternative mechanism wherein cavities are filled with protein side chains resulting from a structure relaxation has been suggested [Lóópez CJ, Yang Z, Altenbach C, Hubbell WL (2013) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(46):E4306–E4315]. In the present study, mechanisms for elimination of cavities under high pressure are investigated in the L99A cavity mutant of T4 lysozyme and derivatives thereof using site-directed spin labeling, pressure-resolved double electron–electron resonance, and high-pressure circular dichroism spectroscopy. In the L99A mutant, the ground state is in equilibrium with an excited state of only ∼3% of the population in which the cavity is filled by a protein side chain [Bouvignies et al. (2011) Nature 477(7362):111–114]. The results of the present study show that in L99A the native ground state is the dominant conformation to pressures of 3 kbar, with cavity hydration apparently taking place in the range of 2–3 kbar. However, in the presence of additional mutations that lower the free energy of the excited state, pressure strongly populates the excited state, thereby eliminating the cavity with a native side chain rather than solvent. Thus, both cavity hydration and structure relaxation are mechanisms for cavity elimination under pressure, and which is dominant is determined by details of the energy landscape.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1506505112
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Reviewers: F.W.D., University of California, Santa Barbara; D.D., Washington State University; and F.A.A.M., Aarhus University.
1M.T.L. and C.J.L. contributed equally to this work.
Author contributions: M.T.L., C.J.L., and W.L.H. designed research; M.T.L., C.J.L., Z.Y., M.J.K., and J.H. performed research; M.T.L., C.J.L., Z.Y., J.H., and W.L.H. analyzed data; and M.T.L., C.J.L., and W.L.H. wrote the paper.
2Present address: Grifols Biologicals Inc., Los Angeles, CA 90032.
Contributed by Wayne L. Hubbell, April 2, 2015 (sent for review March 12, 2015; reviewed by Frederick W. Dahlquist, Dmitri Davydov, and Frans A. A. Mulder)
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.1506505112