The Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure: Exploring the Impact of Private Versus Public Contexts and the Response Latency Criterion on Pro-White and Anti-Black Stereotyping Among White Irish Individuals

The current research comprised two experiments that employed the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) as a measure of implicit racial attitudes. White Irish participants were exposed to blocks of trials that involved responding in a manner consistent with either a pro-white stereotype or...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Psychological record Vol. 60; no. 1; pp. 57 - 79
Main Authors Barnes-Holmes, Dermot, Murphy, Aisling, Barnes-Holmes, Yvonne, Stewart, Ian
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cham Springer International Publishing 2010
Southern Illinois University Carbondale
The Association for Behavior Analysis International
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The current research comprised two experiments that employed the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) as a measure of implicit racial attitudes. White Irish participants were exposed to blocks of trials that involved responding in a manner consistent with either a pro-white stereotype or a pro-black stereotype. In Experiment 1, participants completed the IRAP in either a public or private assessment situation. It was hypothesized that implicit pro-white stereotyping would decrease in the public context relative to the private context. The results, however, were not in accordance with this prediction. A second experiment was conducted to determine if requiring participants to respond in a public context but within a shorter timeframe would impact significantly upon implicit stereotyping. The results showed that a reduction in response latency significantly increased ingroup stereotyping. The findings appear to be consistent with the relational elaboration and coherence model.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0033-2933
2163-3452
DOI:10.1007/BF03395694