Synthesis and Analysis of Impregnation on Activated Carbon in Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube for Cu Adsorption from Wastewater

Industrial wastes contain more toxins that get dissolved in the rivers and lakes, which are means of freshwater reservoirs. The contamination of freshwater leads to various issues for microorganisms and humans. This paper proposes a novel method to remove excess copper from the water. The nanotubes...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBioinorganic chemistry and applications Vol. 2022; no. 1; p. 7470263
Main Authors Natrayan, L., Arul Kumar, P. V., Dhanraj, Joshuva Arockia, Kaliappan, S., Sivakumar, N. S., Patil, Pravin P., Sekar, S., Paramasivam, Prabhu
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Hindawi 2022
Hindawi Limited
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Industrial wastes contain more toxins that get dissolved in the rivers and lakes, which are means of freshwater reservoirs. The contamination of freshwater leads to various issues for microorganisms and humans. This paper proposes a novel method to remove excess copper from the water. The nanotubes are used as a powder in membrane form to remove the copper from the water. The multiwalled carbon nanotube is widely used as a membrane for filtration. It contains many graphene layers of nm size that easily adsorbs the copper when the water permeates through it. Activated carbon is the earliest and most economical method that also adsorbs copper to a certain extent. This paper proposes the methods of involving the activated carbon in the multiwalled carbon nanotube to improve the adsorption capability of the copper. Here, activated carbon is impregnated on the multiwalled carbon nanotube’s defect and imperfect surface areas. It makes more adsorption sites on the surface, increasing the adsorption amount. The same method is applied to Hydroxyl functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Both the methods showed better results and increased the copper removal. The functionalized method removed 93.82% copper, whereas the nonfunctionalized method removed 80.62% copper from the water.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Academic Editor: S. Manignadan
ISSN:1565-3633
1687-479X
DOI:10.1155/2022/7470263