Changes in ectomycorrhizal fungal community composition and declining diversity along a 2-million-year soil chronosequence

Ectomycorrhizal (ECM) fungal communities covary with host plant communities along soil fertility gradients, yet it is unclear whether this reflects changes in host composition, fungal edaphic specialization or priority effects during fungal community establishment. We grew two co‐occurring ECM plant...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMolecular ecology Vol. 25; no. 19; pp. 4919 - 4929
Main Authors Albornoz, Felipe E., Teste, François P., Lambers, Hans, Bunce, Michael, Murray, Dáithí C., White, Nicole E., Laliberté, Etienne
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.10.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Ectomycorrhizal (ECM) fungal communities covary with host plant communities along soil fertility gradients, yet it is unclear whether this reflects changes in host composition, fungal edaphic specialization or priority effects during fungal community establishment. We grew two co‐occurring ECM plant species (to control for host identity) in soils collected along a 2‐million‐year chronosequence representing a strong soil fertility gradient and used soil manipulations to disentangle the effects of edaphic properties from those due to fungal inoculum. Ectomycorrhizal fungal community composition changed and richness declined with increasing soil age; these changes were linked to pedogenesis‐driven shifts in edaphic properties, particularly pH and resin‐exchangeable and organic phosphorus. However, when differences in inoculum potential or soil abiotic properties among soil ages were removed while host identity was held constant, differences in ECM fungal communities and richness among chronosequence stages disappeared. Our results show that ECM fungal communities strongly vary during long‐term ecosystem development, even within the same hosts. However, these changes could not be attributed to short‐term fungal edaphic specialization or differences in fungal inoculum (i.e. density and composition) alone. Rather, they must reflect longer‐term ecosystem‐level feedback between soil, vegetation and ECM fungi during pedogenesis.
Bibliography:ANZ Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment
Australian Research Council (ARC)
DECRA - No. DE120100352; No. DP130100016
University of Western Australia
CONICYT BECASCHILE/DOCTORADO - No. 72130286
ark:/67375/WNG-PH14JXRD-P
Hermon Slade
UWA Research and Development Award
istex:420EA2F1D118F8DA67B3BECA6F4C4D8163492E33
ArticleID:MEC13778
Appendix S1 Description of collecting method for field-collected roots. Appendix S2 Detailed description of DNA amplification, sequencing, bioinformatics and statistical functions and packages used. Appendix S3 Detailed description of results from field-collected samples. Fig. S1 Comparison of OTU richness and rarefied OTU richness among chronosequence stages between all fungal and only ECM OTUs. Fig. S2 Summary of results from field-collected samples. Table S1 Pairwise comparisons among chronosequence stages for each individual ECM lineage for the field soil treatment. Table S2 Multivariate relationship between soil properties and ECM OTU richness for the field-collected samples. Table S3 Multivariate relationship between soil properties and ECM OTU richness for the glasshouse experiment.Table S4 OTU identification, BLAST matches and sequence abundance among samples for the field-collected samples.Table S5 OTU identification, BLAST matches and sequence abundance among samples for the glasshouse experiment.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0962-1083
1365-294X
DOI:10.1111/mec.13778