Maternal serum screening for Down syndrome - opinions on acceptance from Swedish women

Background:  Different screening procedures are becoming an important part of health care. Information about screening and its consequences can be difficult to both impart and understand. This study examined women's theoretical acceptance of a new screening procedure, before its introduction. M...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inScandinavian journal of caring sciences Vol. 17; no. 1; pp. 30 - 34
Main Authors Crang-Svalenius, Elizabeth, Dykes, Anna-Karin, Jörgensen, Connie
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Science Ltd 01.03.2003
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background:  Different screening procedures are becoming an important part of health care. Information about screening and its consequences can be difficult to both impart and understand. This study examined women's theoretical acceptance of a new screening procedure, before its introduction. Methods:  A group of women (n = 823), who had made an informed choice about the form of foetal diagnosis they wished for, were also asked, in a questionnaire, about their opinion on the acceptability of serum screening for Down syndrome. The main purpose of the this was to ascertain their feelings when making a choice. Results:  Replies were received from 80.4%. The answers indicated that serum screening would be acceptable to 86% of the women who had chosen a second trimester ultrasound examination. Of the women who had chosen amniocentesis, 51% would consider the test acceptable as a first alternative. Conclusions:  The ease with which the women were able to make their choice of prenatal diagnosis had bearing on their degree of acceptance of serum screening for Down syndrome.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-1TBC0QRG-G
ArticleID:SCS114
istex:E817285AE7808A3E03572C92CE0AB4482243BEAF
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0283-9318
1471-6712
1471-6712
DOI:10.1046/j.1471-6712.2003.00114.x