Wet‐Spun Bioelectronic Fibers of Imbricated Enzymes and Carbon Nanotubes for Efficient Microelectrodes
The electrical connection of enzymes and microelectrodes is usually achieved through the direct deposition of biomolecules at the electrode surface. Optimization of this interface can be achieved by using conductive nanomaterials such as carbon nanotubes, by adding shuttles of electrons, and/or by t...
Saved in:
Published in | ChemElectroChem Vol. 2; no. 12; pp. 1908 - 1912 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Weinheim
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
01.12.2015
Weinheim : Wiley-VCH |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The electrical connection of enzymes and microelectrodes is usually achieved through the direct deposition of biomolecules at the electrode surface. Optimization of this interface can be achieved by using conductive nanomaterials such as carbon nanotubes, by adding shuttles of electrons, and/or by tuning the geometry of the electrode. However, immobilized enzymes remain essentially located at the outer surface of the electrode, thereby limiting the current density of the devices. A single‐step, scalable wet‐spinning approach that allows the fabrication of microfibers into which enzymes and carbon nanotubes are imbricated in the core of the fiber is reported in this work. The efficiency of these bioelectronics fibers is tested in the enzymatic reduction of O2 and glucose oxidation. The presented microelectrodes exhibit a significantly enhanced activity compared to surface‐coated microelectrodes, while preserving all of the advantages of microelectrodes in terms of miniaturization and spatiotemporal resolution.
A special arrangement: A scalable, single‐step, wet‐spinning approach that allows the fabrication of microfibers into which enzymes and carbon nanotubes are imbricated in the core of the fiber is reported. A sevenfold increase in current density and a significantly improved stability can be achieved by using the present protocol compared to a usual surface‐coating method. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | These authors contributed equally ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 2196-0216 2196-0216 |
DOI: | 10.1002/celc.201500371 |