Patterns of spread of Tomato spotted wilt virus in field crops of lettuce and pepper: spatial dynamics and validation of control measures

Summary Patterns of spread of Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) were examined in lettuce and pepper plantings into which thrips vectors spread the virus from external virus sources. These plantings were: 1) seven separate field trials into which TSWV ‘infector’ plants of tomato were introduced alongs...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of applied biology Vol. 145; no. 2; pp. 231 - 245
Main Authors Coutts, B.A, Thomas-Carroll, M.L, Jones, R.A.C
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.10.2004
Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Summary Patterns of spread of Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) were examined in lettuce and pepper plantings into which thrips vectors spread the virus from external virus sources. These plantings were: 1) seven separate field trials into which TSWV ‘infector’ plants of tomato were introduced alongside or near to plantings of lettuce or pepper, and 2) three commercial lettuce plantings into which spread from nearby external infection sources was occurring naturally. The vector thrips species were Frankliniella occidentalis, F. schnitzel and Thrips tabaci, at least two of which were always present. Spatial data for plants with TSWV infection collected at different stages in the growing period were assessed by plotting gradients of infection, and using Spatial Analysis by Distance IndicEs (SADIE) and maps of spatial pattern. Despite the persistent nature of TSWV transmission by thrips vectors, in both lettuce and pepper plantings there was a steep decline in TSWV incidence with distance from external infection sources that were alongside them. The extent of clustering increased over time and was greatest closest to the source. The relationship between percentage infection and assessment date suggested that spread was predominantly monocyclic with only limited polycyclic spread. Development of isolated clusters of infected plants distant from TSWV sources within both crops was consistent with only limited polycyclic spread. Spread to lettuce was greater downwind than upwind of virus source, with magnitude and proximity of source determining the amount of spread. When 15 m wide fallow or non‐host (cabbage) barriers separated TSWV sources from lettuce plantings, spread was slower and there was much less clustering with the latter. In commercial lettuce plantings, spread was favoured by TSWV movement within successive side‐by‐side plantings. The spatial data from the diverse scenarios examined enabled recommendations to be made over ‘safe’ planting distances between external infection sources of different magnitudes and susceptible crops that were short‐lived (e.g. lettuce) or long‐lived (e.g. pepper). They also helped validate the inclusion of isolation and ‘safe’ planting distances, planting upwind, prompt removal of virus sources, avoidance of side‐by‐side plantings, and deploying intervening non‐host barrier crops as control measures within an integrated disease management strategy for TSWV in field vegetable crops.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-8QG2DL83-D
istex:D00F01EC40307FE7AFF81F84C4F9AD2A7982D8ED
ArticleID:AAB231
Current address: Australian Quarantine and Inspection Service, P O Box 1410, Canning Vale, WA 6970, Australia
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0003-4746
1744-7348
DOI:10.1111/j.1744-7348.2004.tb00379.x