Strategies and endpoints of antifibrotic drug trials: Summary and recommendations from the AASLD Emerging Trends Conference, Chicago, June 2014

There is an urgent need to develop antifibrotic therapies for chronic liver disease, and clarify which endpoints in antifibrotic trials will be acceptable to regulatory agencies. The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases sponsored an endpoints conference to help accelerate the efficie...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHepatology (Baltimore, Md.) Vol. 62; no. 2; pp. 627 - 634
Main Authors Torok, Natalie J., Dranoff, Jonathan A., Schuppan, Detlef, Friedman, Scott L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.08.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:There is an urgent need to develop antifibrotic therapies for chronic liver disease, and clarify which endpoints in antifibrotic trials will be acceptable to regulatory agencies. The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases sponsored an endpoints conference to help accelerate the efficient testing of antifibrotic agents and develop recommendations on clinical trial design for liver fibrosis. In this review, we summarize the salient and novel elements of this conference and provide directions for future clinical trial design. The article follows the structure of the conference and is organized into five areas: (1) antifibrotic trial design; (2) preclinical proof‐of‐concept studies; (3) pharmacological targets, including rationale and lessons to learn; (4) rational drug design and development; and (5) consensus and recommendations on design of clinical trials in liver fibrosis. Expert overviews and collaborative discussions helped to summarize the key unmet needs and directions for the future, including: (1) greater clarification of at‐risk populations and study groups; (2) standardization of all elements of drug discovery and testing; (3) standardization of clinical trial approaches; (4) accelerated development of improved noninvasive markers; and (5) need for exploration of potential off‐target toxicities of future antifibrotic drugs. (Hepatology 2015;62:627–634
Bibliography:All authors contributed equally to this article.
Potential conflict of interest: Dr. Friedman consults, owns stock in, and received grants from Galectin and Tobira. He consults and owns stock in Conatus, Intercept, Exalenz, and Kinemed. He consults for AbbVie, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Fibrogen, Gilead, Intermune, Nimbus, Sandhill, Nitto Denko, and Pfizer.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0270-9139
1527-3350
DOI:10.1002/hep.27720