Work ability and productivity in patients with diabetic foot

To assess work ability and productivity in patients with diabetic foot. This investigation was a cross-sectional controlled study. A total of 117 individuals were selected from March to June 2014 and allocated to group A (patients without diabetes, n=43), group B (diabetes patients without foot ulce...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinics (São Paulo, Brazil) Vol. 74; p. e421
Main Authors Cabeceira, Helga dos Santos, de Souza, Diba Maria Sebba Tosta, Juliano, Yara, Veiga, Daniela Francescato
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Portuguese
Published Brazil Elsevier España, S.L.U 01.01.2019
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
Faculdade de Medicina / USP
Elsevier España
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To assess work ability and productivity in patients with diabetic foot. This investigation was a cross-sectional controlled study. A total of 117 individuals were selected from March to June 2014 and allocated to group A (patients without diabetes, n=43), group B (diabetes patients without foot ulcers, n=43), or group C (patients with diabetic foot, n=31). Two validated instruments, the Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ) and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire General Health v2.0 (WPAI-GH), were used to assess work ability and productivity. The groups were homogeneous regarding age and sex; however, patients in group C had a lower education level than the other participants (p=0.006). The median WLQ scores for groups A, B, and C were 0.0121, 0.0146, and 0.0852, respectively (p<0.0001). The WPAI-GH scores revealed a mean productivity loss of 20% for groups A and B and 100% for group C (p<0.0001). Patients with diabetic foot showed decreased work ability and productivity.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1807-5932
1980-5322
1980-5322
DOI:10.6061/clinics/2019/e421