Comparison of compensatory shoulder movements, functionality and satisfaction in transradial amputees fitted with two prosthetic myoelectric hooks

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 18; no. 2; p. e0272855
• Main Authors: Touillet, Amélie, Billon-Grumillier, Constance, Pierret, Jonathan, Herbe, Pierrick, Martinet, Noël, Loiret, Isabelle, Paysant, Jean
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 02.02.2023
• Subjects: Amputation; Amputees; Artificial Limbs; Biology and Life Sciences; Complications and side effects; Consent; Engineering and Technology; Evaluation; Hooks; Humans; Implants, Artificial; Manual dexterity; Medicine and Health Sciences; Motion capture; Motor ability; Myoelectricity; Patient outcomes; Physical Sciences; Physiological aspects; Prostheses; Prosthesis; Prosthesis Design; Rehabilitation; Shoulder; Shoulder - surgery; Upper Extremity; User satisfaction; Wrist; France
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272855

The functionalities of myoelectric hooks, such as whether they allow wrist movements, as well as the volume and design of the devices, may impact how fitted transradial amputees use their upper limbs. The aim of the current study was to compare two prosthetic myoelectric hooks in terms of compensatory shoulder movements, functionality and user satisfaction. This monocentric, randomized, controlled, cross-over trial evaluated eight transradial amputees fitted with two prosthetic myoelectric hooks, the Greifer and the Axon-Hook, during two consecutive periods. At the end of each period, shoulder abduction (mean and percentage of time with shoulder abduction > 60°) and manual dexterity were assessed using the Box and Blocks Test (BBT) on both sides, and satisfaction was assessed with the Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology questionnaire. For each patient, data obtained with the BBT on the amputated side were compared with those obtained on the non-amputated side. Shoulder abduction was significantly higher with the Greifer (60.9°± 20.3°, p = 0.03) than with the Axon-Hook (39.8°± 16.9°) and also than with the NA side (37.6 ± 19.4°, p = 0.02). Shoulder abduction on the NA side (37.6 ± 19.4°) was close to that of the Axon-Hook (39.8°± 16.9°). The percentage of time spent with shoulder abduction > 60° during the BBT was higher with the Greifer than with the Axon-Hook or with the NA side (53.3 ± 34.4%, 17.6 ± 27.0% and 18.4 ± 34.9%, respectively), but the differences were not significant (p = 0.15). A significant strong negative correlation was found between shoulder abduction and wrist position with the Axon-Hook (r = -0.86; p < 0.01), but not with the Greifer. Manual dexterity and satisfaction did not differ significantly between the two devices. These results revealed compensatory movements, such as shoulder abduction in transradial amputees equipped with hooks, themselves influenced by the prosthetic device settings.