Intra- and Inter-subject Variability in EEG-Based Sensorimotor Brain Computer Interface: A Review

Brain computer interfaces (BCI) for the rehabilitation of motor impairments exploit sensorimotor rhythms (SMR) in the electroencephalogram (EEG). However, the neurophysiological processes underpinning the SMR often vary over time and across subjects. Inherent intra- and inter-subject variability cau...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in computational neuroscience Vol. 13; p. 87
Main Authors Saha, Simanto, Baumert, Mathias
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Research Foundation 21.01.2020
Frontiers Media S.A
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Brain computer interfaces (BCI) for the rehabilitation of motor impairments exploit sensorimotor rhythms (SMR) in the electroencephalogram (EEG). However, the neurophysiological processes underpinning the SMR often vary over time and across subjects. Inherent intra- and inter-subject variability causes covariate shift in data distributions that impede the transferability of model parameters amongst sessions/subjects. Transfer learning includes machine learning-based methods to compensate for inter-subject and inter-session (intra-subject) variability manifested in EEG-derived feature distributions as a covariate shift for BCI. Besides transfer learning approaches, recent studies have explored psychological and neurophysiological predictors as well as inter-subject associativity assessment, which may augment transfer learning in EEG-based BCI. Here, we highlight the importance of measuring inter-session/subject performance predictors for generalized BCI frameworks for both normal and motor-impaired people, reducing the necessity for tedious and annoying calibration sessions and BCI training.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
Edited by: Chun-Shu Wei, National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan
Reviewed by: Bradley Jay Edelman, School of Medicine, Stanford University, United States; Po-Chih Kuo, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, United States; Yu-Kai Wang, University of Technology Sydney, Australia
ISSN:1662-5188
1662-5188
DOI:10.3389/fncom.2019.00087