The evolving quality of frictional contact with graphene
Atomistic simulations reproduce experimental observations of transient frictional strengthening of graphene on an amorphous silicon substrate, an effect which diminishes as the number of graphene layers increases. Why monolayer graphene is no lubricant Graphite and other lamellar materials are used...
Saved in:
Published in | Nature (London) Vol. 539; no. 7630; pp. 541 - 545 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
Nature Publishing Group UK
24.11.2016
Nature Publishing Group |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Atomistic simulations reproduce experimental observations of transient frictional strengthening of graphene on an amorphous silicon substrate, an effect which diminishes as the number of graphene layers increases.
Why monolayer graphene is no lubricant
Graphite and other lamellar materials are used as dry lubricating agents for macroscale metallic sliding components and high-pressure contacts. But how does monolayer graphene compare as a lubricating agent? Ju Li and colleagues studied the atomic stick–slip motion of nanoscale tips sliding against both suspended and supported graphene systems. Their simulations reveal that the quantity of atomic-scale contacts (true contact area) increases with time, and that the commensurability of the graphene with the surface evolves. In other words, carbon atoms become more strongly pinned to the substrate, and the pinned atoms show greater synchrony in their stick–slip behaviour. This is a direct result of the flexibility of the graphene. As additional graphene layers are added, the flexibility of the contact graphene layer is reduced, leading to the reduced frictional strengthening. The effect can be tuned by pre-wrinkling the graphene contact layer.
Graphite and other lamellar materials are used as dry lubricants for macroscale metallic sliding components and high-pressure contacts. It has been shown experimentally that monolayer graphene exhibits higher friction than multilayer graphene and graphite, and that this friction increases with continued sliding, but the mechanism behind this remains subject to debate. It has long been conjectured that the true contact area between two rough bodies controls interfacial friction
1
. The true contact area, defined for example by the number of atoms within the range of interatomic forces, is difficult to visualize directly but characterizes the quantity of contact. However, there is emerging evidence that, for a given pair of materials, the quality of the contact can change, and that this can also strongly affect interfacial friction
2
,
3
,
4
,
5
,
6
,
7
. Recently, it has been found that the frictional behaviour of two-dimensional materials exhibits traits
8
,
9
,
10
,
11
,
12
,
13
unlike those of conventional bulk materials. This includes the abovementioned finding that for few-layer two-dimensional materials the static friction force gradually strengthens for a few initial atomic periods before reaching a constant value. Such transient behaviour, and the associated enhancement of steady-state friction, diminishes as the number of two-dimensional layers increases, and was observed only when the two-dimensional material was loosely adhering to a substrate
8
. This layer-dependent transient phenomenon has not been captured by any simulations
14
,
15
. Here, using atomistic simulations, we reproduce the experimental observations of layer-dependent friction and transient frictional strengthening on graphene. Atomic force analysis reveals that the evolution of static friction is a manifestation of the natural tendency for thinner and less-constrained graphene to re-adjust its configuration as a direct consequence of its greater flexibility. That is, the tip atoms become more strongly pinned, and show greater synchrony in their stick–slip behaviour. While the quantity of atomic-scale contacts (true contact area) evolves, the quality (in this case, the local pinning state of individual atoms and the overall commensurability) also evolves in frictional sliding on graphene. Moreover, the effects can be tuned by pre-wrinkling. The evolving contact quality is critical for explaining the time-dependent friction of configurationally flexible interfaces. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0028-0836 1476-4687 1476-4687 |
DOI: | 10.1038/nature20135 |