Rating scales measuring the severity of psychotic depression

Objective Unipolar psychotic depression (PD) is a severe and debilitating syndrome, which requires intensive monitoring. The objective of this study was to provide an overview of the rating scales used to assess illness severity in PD. Method Selective review of publications reporting results on non...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inActa psychiatrica Scandinavica Vol. 132; no. 5; pp. 335 - 344
Main Authors Østergaard, S. D., Rothschild, A. J., Flint, A. J., Mulsant, B. H., Whyte, E. M., Leadholm, A. K., Bech, P., Meyers, B. S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.11.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective Unipolar psychotic depression (PD) is a severe and debilitating syndrome, which requires intensive monitoring. The objective of this study was to provide an overview of the rating scales used to assess illness severity in PD. Method Selective review of publications reporting results on non‐self‐rated, symptom‐based rating scales utilized to measure symptom severity in PD. The clinical and psychometric validity of the identified rating scales was reviewed. Results A total of 14 rating scales meeting the predefined criteria were included in the review. These scales grouped into the following categories: (i) rating scales predominantly covering depressive symptoms, (ii) rating scales predominantly covering psychotic symptoms, (iii) rating scales covering delusions, and (iv) rating scales covering PD. For the vast majority of the scales, the clinical and psychometric validity had not been tested empirically. The only exception from this general tendency was the 11‐item Psychotic Depression Assessment Scale (PDAS), which was developed specifically to assess the severity of PD. Conclusion In PD, the PDAS represents the only empirically derived rating scale for the measurement of overall severity of illness. The PDAS should be considered in future studies of PD and in clinical practice.
Bibliography:ArticleID:ACPS12449
istex:5FA3EEDA463F75A0636D087FEFC246930FB0C753
ark:/67375/WNG-MJ0DQ12Z-T
US Public Health Service - No. MH 62446; No. MH 62518; No. MH 62565; No. MH 62624
National Center for Research Resources - No. M01-RR024153; No. RR000056; No. CTSC UL1RR024996
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) - No. MH069430; No. MH067710; No. P30 MH068368
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:0001-690X
1600-0447
DOI:10.1111/acps.12449