Changes of Virtual Planar QRS and T Vectors Derived from Holter in the Populations with and without Diabetes Mellitus

Aims Research related to type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and parameters of electrocardiography (ECG) was limited. Patients with and without DM (NDM) were randomly enrolled in a study to exploit the influence of DM on planar QRS and T vectors derived from the Virtual Holter process. Methods A total of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of noninvasive electrocardiology Vol. 21; no. 1; pp. 69 - 81
Main Authors Chen, Jia, Lin, Yubi, Yu, Jian, Chen, Wanqun, Xu, Zhe, Yang, Zhenzhen, Zeng, Chuqian, Li, Wenfeng, Lai, Xiaoshu, Lu, Qiji, Zhou, Jingwen, Tian, Bixia, Xu, Jing, Lin, Yanping, Du, Zuoyi, Zhang, Aidong
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.01.2016
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Aims Research related to type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and parameters of electrocardiography (ECG) was limited. Patients with and without DM (NDM) were randomly enrolled in a study to exploit the influence of DM on planar QRS and T vectors derived from the Virtual Holter process. Methods A total of 216 (NDM) and 127 DM patients were consecutively and randomly recruited. We selected a 1‐minute length of ECG, which was scheduled for analysis at 4 AM. After a series of calculating algorisms, we received the virtual planar vector parameters. Results Patients with DM were elderly (65.61 ± 12.08 vs 59.41 ± 16.86 years, P < 0.001); higher morbidity of hypertension (76.38% vs 58.14%, P < 0.001) and coronary artery disease (44.09% vs 32.41%, P = 0.03); thicker interventricular septum (10.92 ± 1.77 vs 10.08 ± 1.96 mm, P < 0.001) and left ventricular posterior wall (9.84 ± 1.38 vs 9.39 ± 1.66 mm, P = 0.03); higher lipid levels and average heart rate (66.67 ± 12.04 vs 61.87 ± 13.36 bpm, P < 0.01); higher angle of horizontal QRS vector (HQRSA, –2.87 ± 48.48 vs –19.00 ± 40.18 degrees, P < 0.01); lower maximal magnitude of horizontal T vector (HTV, 2.33 ± 1.47 vs 2.88 ± 1.89 mm, P = 0.01) and maximal magnitude of right side T vector (2.77 ± 1.55 vs 3.27 ± 1.92 mm, P = 0.03), and no difference in angle of frontal QRS‐T vector (FQRSTA, 32.77 ± 54.20 vs 28.39 ± 52.87 degrees, P = 0.74) compared with patients having NDM. After adjusting for confounding factors, DM was significantly effective on FQRSTA (regression coefficient –40.0, 95%CI –66.4 to –13.6, P < 0.01), HQRSA (regression coefficient 22.6, 95%CI 2.5 to 42.8, P = 0.03), and HTV (regression coefficient 0.9, 95%CI 0.2 to 1.7, P = 0.01). Confounding factors included: sex, 2‐hour postprandial blood glucose, smoking, triglyceride, apolipoprotein A, creatinine, left ventricular ejection fraction, and average heart rate. Conclusions The risk factors of DM and lipid metabolism abnormality particularly apolipoprotein A significantly modified parameters of virtual planar QRS and T vector, including frontal QRS‐T angle.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-W0L3PBP8-Z
istex:74416C6C7C1FFCA179EC4F049D72009BEE8E959B
ArticleID:ANEC12276
Sources of Funding: This work was supported by grants from the Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities (No. 21611333), the Science and Technological Program of Guangdong Province (No. 2010–1096–136; 2011B031800336), the Science and Technological Projects of Guangzhou (No. 2014Y2–00128), and the Key Disciplines’ Funds and Special Research Funds (No. 2012207) of the First Clinical Medical College of Jinan University, Basic Research Expenses of Jinan University. Chinese Doctor Organization's Foundation of the cardiovascular research and exploration (NO.DFCMDA201221).
Disclosures: The authors take responsibility for all aspects of the reliability and freedom from bias of the data presented and their interpretation discussed.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1082-720X
1542-474X
DOI:10.1111/anec.12276