Assembling and Spilling-Over: Towards an 'Ethnography of Cement' in a Palestinian Refugee Camp
Camps as objects of study are all but moored in the juridico‐political and the ‘structure versus agency' binary. This article attempts to move beyond this paradigmatic frame towards a reading of the camp as a material assemblage that brings subjects and objects, people and things into mutually...
Saved in:
Published in | International journal of urban and regional research Vol. 39; no. 2; pp. 200 - 217 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.03.2015
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Camps as objects of study are all but moored in the juridico‐political and the ‘structure versus agency' binary. This article attempts to move beyond this paradigmatic frame towards a reading of the camp as a material assemblage that brings subjects and objects, people and things into mutually constitutive relations. In one Palestinian refugee camp it ‘ethnographically' tracks the most mundane, but ubiquitous, element there is: cement. If the Palestinian camp is subject to a foundational—and quintessentially modern—separation between the material and the representational, then cement, as the medium of a certain temporal dynamism in built life, is the point of this separation's excess. Cement, as both aesthetic and thing, mediates camp life in entirely unintended ways, breaching topological boundaries, spilling quotidian life—in all its uncategorized mess—into the political, and generating tension between the temporary and the permanent, return and the built. It is precisely in these tensions that refugee subjectivity takes shape; never simply as the directed actions of sovereign actors, but always as an everyday ‘negotiation' of the in‐between space of the spillover—this cleft between discursive subject positions and the vitality of built life itself. Camp form, here, is not derivative of legal structure, but an ever‐moving relationship between temporality and materiality. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ArticleID:IJUR12155 istex:EF918EE06EFB90BE2909C91F1B04C20151E5BF9F ark:/67375/WNG-07S1Q9XR-2 This article greatly benefited from the careful reading and critical feedback of Timothy Mitchell, May Jayyusi and colleagues at Columbia University. It also owes much to long conversations with Yuval Kremnitzer, Peter Lagerquist and Laura Pereira—unwitting accomplices but all the more present for being so. I also thank three IJURR reviewers. Research carried out was generously supported by Columbia University's Middle East Institute. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0309-1317 1468-2427 |
DOI: | 10.1111/1468-2427.12155 |