Youth Justice staff attitudes towards screening for self-harm

Young offenders are recognised as a high‐risk group for suicidal behaviour. It is essential that the screening used to identify those at risk and refer them to mental health services is effective, especially in community settings where service utilisation is low. Staff attitudes towards screening fo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHealth & social care in the community Vol. 20; no. 5; pp. 506 - 515
Main Authors Knowles, Sarah E., Townsend, Ellen, Anderson, Martin P.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.09.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Young offenders are recognised as a high‐risk group for suicidal behaviour. It is essential that the screening used to identify those at risk and refer them to mental health services is effective, especially in community settings where service utilisation is low. Staff attitudes towards screening for suicide and self‐harm are likely to influence how a young offender engages with the screening process. Our study is the first to explore community youth justice staff attitudes towards, and perceptions of, screening for self‐harmful behaviour. Eight semi‐structured interviews were conducted at an English Youth Offending Team in June 2006 with staff who had used the suicide screening tool with young offenders. Data were analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Staff attitudes towards working within the screening system varied along two dimensions. The first ‘active/passive’ dimension related to perceived confidence in dealing with self‐harm. The second ‘positive/negative’ dimension related to perceptions of the benefits of screening and the effectiveness of mental health provision for young offenders. Results indicate that barriers to effective screening must be tackled at both individual and organisational levels. The model of attitudes presented here could be used to increase understanding of how staff can be supported to engage effectively with the screening system.
Bibliography:istex:ACF28B91F740A72C53985623BAB2781D1B1BB09E
ArticleID:HSC1061
ark:/67375/WNG-S2N4LTDR-2
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0966-0410
1365-2524
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2524.2012.01061.x