Accountability, trust and informed consent in medical practice and research

During the last 25 years public policy in the UK has aimed to replace ‘club' cultures and their supposedly suspect reliance on trust between professionals and public with a new public culture based on accountability and ‘transparency'. These transformations have changed both clinical pract...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical medicine (London, England) Vol. 4; no. 3; pp. 269 - 276
Main Author O’Neill, Onora
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Elsevier Ltd 01.05.2004
Royal College of Physicians
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1470-2118
1473-4893
DOI10.7861/clinmedicine.4-3-269

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:During the last 25 years public policy in the UK has aimed to replace ‘club' cultures and their supposedly suspect reliance on trust between professionals and public with a new public culture based on accountability and ‘transparency'. These transformations have changed both clinical practice and public health policy in deep ways. Are the new conceptions of accountability adequate? Are obligations to be ‘transparent' any more than requirements to disclose information which overlook the need for genuine communication? Can demands for ever fuller informed consent improve accountability to individual patients and research subjects? Could we devise more intelligent conceptions of accountability that support more intelligent placing and refusal of trust? What might intelligent conceptions of accountability suggest about proper clinical practice, public health medicine and professional responsibilities?
Bibliography:ObjectType-Speech/Lecture-1
content type line 23
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ISSN:1470-2118
1473-4893
DOI:10.7861/clinmedicine.4-3-269