Interlaced X-Ray Microplanar Beams: A Radiosurgery Approach with Clinical Potential
Studies have shown that x-rays delivered as arrays of parallel microplanar beams (microbeams), 25- to 90-μm thick and spaced 100-300 μm on-center, respectively, spare normal tissues including the central nervous system (CNS) and preferentially damage tumors. However, such thin microbeams can only be...
Saved in:
Published in | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 103; no. 25; pp. 9709 - 9714 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
National Academy of Sciences
20.06.2006
National Acad Sciences |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Studies have shown that x-rays delivered as arrays of parallel microplanar beams (microbeams), 25- to 90-μm thick and spaced 100-300 μm on-center, respectively, spare normal tissues including the central nervous system (CNS) and preferentially damage tumors. However, such thin microbeams can only be produced by synchrotron sources and have other practical limitations to clinical implementation. To approach this problem, we first studied CNS tolerance to much thicker beams. Three of four rats whose spinal cords were exposed transaxially to four 400-Gy, 0.68-mm microbeams, spaced 4 mm, and all four rats irradiated to their brains with large, 170-Gy arrays of such beams spaced 1.36 mm, all observed for 7 months, showed no paralysis or behavioral changes. We then used an interlacing geometry in which two such arrays at a 90° angle produced the equivalent of a contiguous beam in the target volume only. By using this approach, we produced 90-, 120-, and 150-Gy 3.4 x 3.4 x 3.4 mm³ exposures in the rat brain. MRIs performed 6 months later revealed focal damage within the target volume at the 120- and 150-Gy doses but no apparent damage elsewhere at 120 Gy. Monte Carlo calculations indicated a 30-μm dose falloff (80-20%) at the edge of the target, which is much less than the 2- to 5-mm value for conventional radiotherapy and radiosurgery. These findings strongly suggest potential application of interlaced microbeams to treat tumors or to ablate nontumorous abnormalities with minimal damage to surrounding normal tissue. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 BNL-78966-2007-JA DE-AC02-98CH10886 Doe - Office Of Science dPresent address: University of California, Irvine, CA 92697 iPermanent address: Faculty of Engineering, University of Yamagata, Yamagata, Japan. Author contributions: F.A.D., Z.Z., H.B., and D.J.A. designed research; F.A.D., Z.Z., T.B., H.B., R.W., J.W., T.Y., and D.J.A. performed research; F.A.D., H.B., P.R., R.W., J.W., E.M.R., and D.J.A. analyzed data; and F.A.D., Z.Z., H.B., P.R., R.W., E.M.R., and D.J.A. wrote the paper. Communicated by Richard B. Setlow, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, May 2, 2006 |
ISSN: | 0027-8424 1091-6490 |
DOI: | 10.1073/pnas.0603567103 |