Population genetics of the frog-killing fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis

Global amphibian decline by chytridiomycosis is a major environmental disaster that has been attributed to either recent fungal spread or environmental change that promotes disease. Here, we present a population genetic comparison of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis isolates from an intensively studie...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 104; no. 34; pp. 13845 - 13850
Main Authors Morgan, Jess A.T, Vredenburg, Vance T, Rachowicz, Lara J, Knapp, Roland A, Stice, Mary J, Tunstall, Tate, Bingham, Rob E, Parker, John M, Longcore, Joyce E, Moritz, Craig, Briggs, Cheryl J, Taylor, John W
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States National Academy of Sciences 21.08.2007
National Acad Sciences
SeriesFrom the Cover
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Global amphibian decline by chytridiomycosis is a major environmental disaster that has been attributed to either recent fungal spread or environmental change that promotes disease. Here, we present a population genetic comparison of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis isolates from an intensively studied region of frog decline, the Sierra Nevada of California. In support of a novel pathogen, we find low diversity, no amphibian-host specificity, little correlation between fungal genotype and geography, local frog extirpation by a single fungal genotype, and evidence of human-assisted fungus migration. In support of endemism, at a local scale, we find some diverse, recombining populations. Therefore neither epidemic spread nor endemism alone explains this particular amphibian decline. Recombination raises the possibility of resistant sporangia and a mechanism for rapid spread as well as persistence that could greatly complicate global control of the pathogen.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Author contributions: J.A.T.M., C.M., C.J.B., and J.W.T. designed research; J.A.T.M., V.T.V., L.J.R., R.A.K., M.J.S., T.T., R.E.B., J.M.P., and J.E.L. performed research; J.M.P. provided veterinary advice; J.A.T.M., V.T.V., T.T., C.M., C.J.B., and J.W.T. analyzed data; and J.A.T.M. and J.W.T. wrote the paper.
Edited by David B. Wake, University of California, Berkeley, CA, and approved June 27, 2007
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.0701838104