Characteristics of foodborne outbreaks in which use of analytical epidemiological studies contributed to identification of suspected vehicles, European Union, 2007 to 2011

• Published in: Epidemiology and infection Vol. 145; no. 6; pp. 1231 - 1238
• Main Authors: SCHLINKMANN, K. M., RAZUM, O., WERBER, D.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 01.04.2017
• Subjects: Disease; Disease Outbreaks; Epidemics; Epidemiologic Studies; Epidemiology; Europe - epidemiology; European Union; Food safety; Foodborne diseases; Foodborne Diseases - epidemiology; Gastrointestinal Infections; Health surveillance; Hospitalization; Households; Humans; Infectious diseases; Investigations; Mathematical analysis; Original Papers; Outbreaks; Prevalence; Public health; Quality assurance; Regression analysis; Variables; Vehicles; Zoonoses; Berlin Germany; Europe; Germany; ANE, Europe; foodborne diseases; public health surveillance; disease outbreaks; epidemiological studies; Communicable diseases
• ISSN: 0950-2688; 1469-4409; 1469-4409
• DOI: 10.1017/S0950268816003344

Foodborne disease outbreaks (FBDOs) occur frequently in Europe. Employing analytical epidemiological study designs increases the likelihood of identifying the suspected vehicle(s), but these studies are rarely applied in FBDO investigations. We used multivariable binary logistic regression analysis to identify characteristics of investigated FBDOs reported to the European Food Safety Authority (2007–2011) that were associated with analytical epidemiological evidence (compared to evidence from microbiological investigations/descriptive epidemiology only). The analysis was restricted to FBDO investigations, where the evidence for the suspected vehicle was considered ‘strong’, i.e. convincing. The presence of analytical epidemiological evidence was reported in 2012 (50%) of these 4038 outbreaks. In multivariable analysis, increasing outbreak size, number of hospitalizations, causative (i.e. aetiological) agent (whether identified and, if so, which one), and the setting in which these outbreaks occurred (e.g. geographically dispersed outbreaks) were independently associated with presence of analytical evidence. The number of investigations with reported analytical epidemiological evidence was unexpectedly high, likely indicating the need for quality assurance within the European Union foodborne outbreak reporting system, and warranting cautious interpretation of our findings. This first analysis of evidence implicating a food vehicle in FBDOs may help to inform public health authorities on when to use analytical epidemiological study designs.