Efficacy and Optimal Pressure of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Lung Cancer

• Published in: Cancers Vol. 14; no. 17; p. 4308
• Main Authors: Park, Jaehyeon, Yea, Ji Woon, Oh, Se An, Park, Jongmoo, Park, Jae Won, Lee, Jeong Eun
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 01.09.2022; MDPI
• Subjects: Breast cancer; Cancer therapies; Care and treatment; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Computed tomography; Continuous positive airway pressure; continuously positive airway pressure; Gating; Heart; Lung cancer; Methods; motion management; Patient outcomes; Patients; Planning; Pneumonitis; Pressure; Radiation therapy; Radiotherapy; Respiration; Respiratory tract; Simulation; Tomography; Tumors; South Korea; United States > US; lung cancer; radiotherapy; continuously positive airway pressure; motion management
• ISSN: 2072-6694; 2072-6694
• DOI: 10.3390/cancers14174308

We aimed to determine the optimal pressure of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for radiotherapy (RT) through changes in the dosimetric parameters and lung volume according to pressure. Patients with locally advanced lung cancer, who underwent CPAP during computed tomography (CT) simulation, were included. The air pressure was raised in five steps of 4, 7, 10, 14, and 17 cmH2O and a CT scan was performed at the baseline and at each pressure step, accompanied by contouring and RT planning. Paired t- and Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to compare the volumetric and dosimetric parameters according to pressure and interpressure. A total of 29 patients were selected, and 158 CT datasets were obtained. The lung volume increased significantly at all pressures (p < 0.01). The Dmean of the lung decreased significantly from 7 cmH2O (p < 0.01), the V5, V10, V15, and V20 of the lung decreased significantly from 7 cmH2O with increasing pressure, and the Dmean and V5 of the heart decreased significantly from 14 cmH2O with increasing pressure. The V50 showed no significant differences at any pressure. We recommend the use of at least 7 cmH2O with 14 cmH2O as the optimal pressure to achieve the effect of heart preservation.