Two physically, functionally, and developmentally distinct peritoneal macrophage subsets

The peritoneal cavity (PerC) is a unique compartment within which a variety of immune cells reside, and from which macrophages (MØ) are commonly drawn for functional studies. Here we define two MØ subsets that coexist in PerC in adult mice. One, provisionally called the large peritoneal MØ (LPM), co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 107; no. 6; pp. 2568 - 2573
Main Authors Ghosn, Eliver Eid Bou, Cassado, Alexandra A, Govoni, Gregory R, Fukuhara, Takeshi, Yang, Yang, Monack, Denise M, Bortoluci, Karina R, Almeida, Sandro R, Herzenberg, Leonard A, Herzenberg, Leonore A
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States National Academy of Sciences 09.02.2010
National Acad Sciences
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The peritoneal cavity (PerC) is a unique compartment within which a variety of immune cells reside, and from which macrophages (MØ) are commonly drawn for functional studies. Here we define two MØ subsets that coexist in PerC in adult mice. One, provisionally called the large peritoneal MØ (LPM), contains approximately 90% of the PerC MØ in unstimulated animals but disappears rapidly from PerC following lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or thioglycolate stimulation. These cells express high levels of the canonical MØ surface markers, CD11b and F4/80. The second subset, referred to as small peritoneal MØ (SPM), expresses substantially lower levels of CD11b and F4/80 but expresses high levels of MHC-II, which is not expressed on LPM. SPM, which predominates in PerC after LPS or thioglycolate stimulation, does not derive from LPM. Instead, it derives from blood monocytes that rapidly enter the PerC after stimulation and differentiate to mature SPM within 2 to 4 d. Both subsets show clear phagocytic activity and both produce nitric oxide (NO) in response to LPS stimulation in vivo. However, their responses to LPS show key differences: in vitro, LPS stimulates LPM, but not SPM, to produce NO; in vivo, LPS stimulates both subsets to produce NO, albeit with different response patterns. These findings extend current models of MØ heterogeneity and shed new light on PerC MØ diversity, development, and function. Thus, they introduce a new context for interpreting (and reinterpreting) data from ex vivo studies with PerC MØ.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Author contributions: E.E.G. and L.eonore A. Herzenberg designed research; E.E.G. and A.A.C. performed research; G.R.G, T.F., and D.M.M. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; E.E.G., A.A.C., G.R.G., T.F., Y.Y., D.M.M., K.R.B., S.R.A., Leonard A. Herzenberg, and Leonore A. Herzenberg analyzed data; and E.E.G., K.R.B., and Leonore A. Herzenberg wrote the paper.
Contributed by Leonard A. Herzenberg, December 28, 2009 (sent for review December 12, 2009)
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.0915000107