Cellulosic biomass pretreatment and sugar yields as a function of biomass particle size
Three lignocellulosic pretreatment techniques (ammonia fiber expansion, dilute acid and ionic liquid) are compared with respect to saccharification efficiency, particle size and biomass composition. In particular, the effects of switchgrass particle size (32-200) on each pretreatment regime are exam...
Saved in:
Published in | PloS one Vol. 9; no. 6; p. e100836 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Public Library of Science
27.06.2014
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Three lignocellulosic pretreatment techniques (ammonia fiber expansion, dilute acid and ionic liquid) are compared with respect to saccharification efficiency, particle size and biomass composition. In particular, the effects of switchgrass particle size (32-200) on each pretreatment regime are examined. Physical properties of untreated and pretreated samples are characterized using crystallinity, surface accessibility measurements and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging. At every particle size tested, ionic liquid (IL) pretreatment results in greater cell wall disruption, reduced crystallinity, increased accessible surface area, and higher saccharification efficiencies compared with dilute acid and AFEX pretreatments. The advantages of using IL pretreatment are greatest at larger particle sizes (>75 µm). |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 AC02-05CH11231 USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER). Biological Systems Science Division Conceived and designed the experiments: MJD HMT MZH. Performed the experiments: MJD HMT VS BK AG MZH. Analyzed the data: MJD HMT VS BK AG MZH. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MA PDA. Wrote the paper: MJD HMT VS BK AG MA PDA MZH. Current address: Synthetic Biology Program, Space BioSciences Division, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA. Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. |
ISSN: | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pone.0100836 |