Motor Activity Log-Brazil: reliability and relationships with motor impairments in individuals with chronic stroke

• Published in: Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria Vol. 70; no. 3; pp. 196 - 201
• Main Authors: Pereira, Natalia Duarte, Ovando, Angélica Cristiane, Michaelsen, Stella Maris, Anjos, Sarah Monteiro Dos, Lima, Renata Cristina Magalhães, Nascimento, Lucas Rodrigues, Teixeira-Salmela, Luci Fuscaldi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English; Portuguese
• Published: Brazil Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO 01.03.2012; Academia Brasileira de Neurologia (ABNEURO)
• Subjects: acidente cerebral vascular; Activities of Daily Living; Chronic Disease; Disability Evaluation; Female; função motora; hemiplegia; Hemiplegia - etiology; Humans; Limbs; Male; Middle Aged; Motor activity; NEUROSCIENCES; Observer Variation; Paresis; PSYCHIATRY; qualidade de movimento; Reproducibility of Results; Stroke; Stroke - complications; Surveys and Questionnaires; Translating; função motora; quality of movement; hemiplegia; qualidade de movimento; acidente cerebral vascular; stroke; motor impairment
• ISSN: 0004-282X; 1678-4227; 1678-4227; 0004-282X
• DOI: 10.1590/S0004-282X2012000300008

The Motor Activity Log (MAL) assesses the spontaneous use of the most affected upper limb with the amount of use (AOU) and quality of movement (QOM) scales during daily activities in real environments in individuals with chronic stroke. This study translated the testing manual into Portuguese and assessed the inter-rater and test-retest reliabilities of the MAL, based upon the Brazilian manual version. The inter-rater reliability was evaluated by comparing the results of two examiners, and the test-retest reliability was tested by comparing the results of two evaluations, repeated one-week apart with 30 individuals with chronic hemiparesis (55.8±15.1 years). The intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) for the total scores were adequate for both the inter-rater (0.98 for the AOU and 0.91 for QOM) and test-retest reliabilities (0.99 for both scales). The results suggested that the MAL was reliable to evaluate the spontaneous use of the most affected upper limb after stroke.