Modulating the Motor System by Action Observation After Stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE—Much recent interest surrounds the use of action observation, which is observing another individual performing a motor task, in stroke rehabilitation, to promote motor recovery by engaging similar brain regions to action execution. This may be especially useful in individuals...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inStroke (1970) Vol. 44; no. 8; pp. 2247 - 2253
Main Authors Garrison, Kathleen Alice, Aziz-Zadeh, Lisa, Wong, Savio Waiho, Liew, Sook-Lei, Winstein, Carolee Joyce
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hagerstown, MD American Heart Association, Inc 01.08.2013
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE—Much recent interest surrounds the use of action observation, which is observing another individual performing a motor task, in stroke rehabilitation, to promote motor recovery by engaging similar brain regions to action execution. This may be especially useful in individuals with limited mobility. Here, we assess how cortical motor activity during action observation is affected by stroke and by stroke-related motor deficits. METHODS—We used functional MRI to compare brain activity during right and left hand action observation in right-handed nondisabled participants and participants who were right-handed before left hemisphere stroke. All participants performed the same actions after their functional MRI. RESULTS—Nondisabled participants show greater bilateral cortical motor activity when observing actions made using the left hand, whereas participants with stroke show greater ipsilesional cortical motor activity when observing actions made using the right (paretic) hand (P<0.05; corrected). For both groups, action processing is modulated by motor capabilitycortical motor activity is greater when observing the hand with lower motor scores (P<0.05; corrected). Furthermore, for stroke, the extent of ipsilesional activity correlates with lesion volume (P=0.049), in a pattern that suggests adaptive plasticity. CONCLUSIONS—We found that action observation activates specific motor plans in damaged motor circuits after stroke, and this activity is related to motor capability to perform the same actions. Cortical motor activity during action observation may be relevant to motor learning, and to motor relearning in stroke rehabilitation.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0039-2499
1524-4628
1524-4628
DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001105