Survival rates and prognostic factors for infiltrating salivary duct carcinoma: Analysis of 228 cases from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database

Background The survival rates and prognostic factors for salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) are not clear. Methods Survival estimates and prognostic factors were evaluated for 228 patients with SDC identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Results Median overall sur...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHead & neck Vol. 36; no. 5; pp. 694 - 701
Main Authors Jayaprakash, Vijayvel, Merzianu, Mihai, Warren, Graham W., Arshad, Hassan, Hicks Jr, Wesley L., Rigual, Nestor R., Sullivan, Maureen A., Seshadri, Mukund, Marshall, James R., Cohan, David M., Zhao, Yujie, Singh, Anurag K.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.05.2014
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background The survival rates and prognostic factors for salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) are not clear. Methods Survival estimates and prognostic factors were evaluated for 228 patients with SDC identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Results Median overall survival (OS) duration for patients with SDC was 79 months and 5‐year disease‐specific survival (DSS) rate was 64%. Among patients with SDC with lymph node involvement, larger primary tumor size (>3 cm) was associated with twice the risk of death (p < .03). Factors predictive of improved DSS were age (p = .01), tumor size (p = .006), tumor grade (p = .02), and lymph node involvement (p < .001). Adjuvant radiotherapy did not improve survival when compared to surgery alone for early‐stage (I–II) disease (p = .28). Conclusion Younger patients with SDC (<50 years) showed a better prognosis. Primary tumor size and lymph node involvement were independent and additive risk factors for poor prognosis. The role of adjuvant radiotherapy in the treatment of SDC needs to be explored further. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 36: 694–701, 2014
Bibliography:ArticleID:HED23350
istex:5BFC722FE70256CC4809DB4263B0588D474B2F94
ark:/67375/WNG-808Q02B5-8
ISSN:1043-3074
1097-0347
DOI:10.1002/hed.23350