Merging existing practices with new ones: the adjustment of organizational routines to using cancer patient pathways in primary healthcare

• Published in: BMC health services research Vol. 22; no. 1; p. 3
• Main Authors: Fjällström, Petter, Coe, Anna-Britt, Lilja, Mikael, Hajdarevic, Senada
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 02.01.2022; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Adaption; Cancer; Care and treatment; Delivery of Health Care; Diagnosis; Grounded Theory; Grounded Theory Method; Group interviews; Health care policy; Health planning; Health services; Humans; Management; Medical diagnosis; Neoplasms - therapy; Nurses; Organizations; Patients; Physicians; Primary care nurses; Primary care physicians; Primary Health Care; Routines; Services; Standardized patient pathways; Sweden; Unintended consequences; Sweden; Routines; Group interviews; Unintended consequences; Adaption; Grounded Theory Method; Standardized patient pathways; Organizations; Primary care nurses; Primary care physicians; Cancer
• ISSN: 1472-6963; 1472-6963
• DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-07348-6

The introduction of new tools can bring unintended consequences for organizational routines. Cancer Patient Pathways (CPP) were introduced into the Swedish healthcare system in 2015 to shorten time to diagnosis and treatment. Primary healthcare (PHC) plays a central role since cancer diagnosis often begins in PHC units. Our study aimed to understand how PHC units adjusted organizational routines to utilizing CPPs. Six PHC units of varied size from both urban and rural areas in northern Sweden were included. Grounded theory method was used to collect and analyse group interviews at each unit. Nine group interviews with nurses and physicians, for a total of 41 participants, were performed between March and November 2019. The interviews focused on CPPs as tools, the PHC units' routines and providers' experiences with using CPPs in their daily work. Our analysis captured how PHC units adjusted organizational routines to utilizing CPPs by fusing existing practices with new practices to offer better quality of care. Specifically, three overarching organizational routines within the PHC units were identified. First, Manoeuvring diverse patient needs with easier patient flow, the PHC units handled the diverse needs of the population while simultaneously drawing upon CPPs to ease the patient flow within the healthcare system. Second, (Dis) integrating internal know-how, the PHC units drew upon internal competence even when PHC know-how was not taken into account by those driving the CPP initiative. Third, Coping with unequal relationships toward secondary care, the PHC units dealt with being in an unequal position while adopting CPPs instead further decreased possibilities to influence decision-making between care-levels. Adopting CPPs as a tool within PHC units brought various unintended consequences in organizational routines. Our study from northern Sweden illustrates that the PHC know-how needs to be integrated into the healthcare system to improve the use of new tools as CPP. Further, the relationships between different levels of care should be taken in account when introducing new tools for healthcare. Also, when adopting innovations, unintended consequences need to be further explored empirically in diverse healthcare contexts internationally in order to generate deeper knowledge in the research area.