Efficacy and Safety of the Seven-Day Buprenorphine Transdermal System in Opioid-Naïve Patients with Moderate to Severe Chronic Low Back Pain: An Enriched, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

This article presents the results of a pivotal Phase 3 study that assesses a new treatment for the management of chronic low back pain: a transdermal patch containing the opioid buprenorphine. In this randomized, placebo-controlled study with an enriched enrollment design, the buprenorphine transder...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of pain and symptom management Vol. 42; no. 6; pp. 903 - 917
Main Authors Steiner, Deborah J., Sitar, Steve, Wen, Warren, Sawyerr, Gosford, Munera, Catherine, Ripa, Steven R., Landau, Craig
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.12.2011
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract This article presents the results of a pivotal Phase 3 study that assesses a new treatment for the management of chronic low back pain: a transdermal patch containing the opioid buprenorphine. In this randomized, placebo-controlled study with an enriched enrollment design, the buprenorphine transdermal system (BTDS) was found to be efficacious and generally well tolerated. This enriched, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study evaluated the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of BTDS in opioid-naïve patients who had moderate to severe chronic low back pain. Patients who tolerated and responded to BTDS (10 or 20 mcg/hour) during an open-label run-in period were randomized to continue BTDS 10 or 20 mcg/hour or receive matching placebo. The primary outcome was “average pain over the last 24 hours” at the end of the 12-week double-blind phase, collected on an 11-point scale (0 = no pain, 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine). Sleep disturbance (Medical Outcomes Study subscale) and total number of supplemental analgesic tablets used were secondary efficacy variables. Fifty-three percent of patients receiving open-label BTDS (541 of 1024) were randomized to receive BTDS ( n = 257) or placebo ( n = 284). Patients receiving BTDS reported statistically significantly lower pain scores at Week 12 compared with placebo (least square mean treatment difference: −0.58, P = 0.010). Sensitivity analyses of the primary efficacy variable and results of the analysis of secondary efficacy variables supported the efficacy of BTDS relative to placebo. During the double-blind phase, the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was 55% for the BTDS treatment group and 52% for the placebo treatment group. Laboratory, vital sign, and electrocardiogram evaluations did not reveal unanticipated safety findings. BTDS was efficacious in the treatment of opioid-naïve patients with moderate to severe chronic low back pain. Most treatment-emergent adverse events observed were consistent with those associated with the use of opioid agonists and transdermal patches.
AbstractList Context. This article presents the results of a pivotal Phase 3 study that assesses a new treatment for the management of chronic low back pain: a transdermal patch containing the opioid buprenorphine. In this randomized, placebo-controlled study with an enriched enrollment design, the buprenorphine transdermal system (BTDS) was found to be efficacious and generally well tolerated. Objectives. This enriched, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study evaluated the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of BTDS in opioid-naive patients who had moderate to severe chronic low back pain. Methods. Patients who tolerated and responded to BTDS (10 or 20 mcg/hour) during an open-label run-in period were randomized to continue BTDS 10 or 20 mcg/hour or receive matching placebo. The primary outcome was "average pain over the last 24 hours" at the end of the 12-week double-blind phase, collected on an 11-point scale (0 = no pain, 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine). Sleep disturbance (Medical Outcomes Study subscale) and total number of supplemental analgesic tablets used were secondary efficacy variables. Results. Fifty-three percent of patients receiving open-label BTDS (541 of 1024) were randomized to receive BTDS (n = 257) or placebo (n = 284). Patients receiving BTDS reported statistically significantly lower pain scores at Week 12 compared with placebo (least square mean treatment difference: -0.58, P = 0.010). Sensitivity analyses of the primary efficacy variable and results of the analysis of secondary efficacy variables supported the efficacy of BTDS relative to placebo. During the double-blind phase, the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was 55% for the BTDS treatment group and 52% for the placebo treatment group. Laboratory, vital sign, and electrocardiogram evaluations did not reveal unanticipated safety findings. Conclusion. BTDS was efficacious in the treatment of opioid-naive patients with moderate to severe chronic low back pain. Most treatment-emergent adverse events observed were consistent with those associated with the use of opioid agonists and transdermal patches. [Copyright U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc.]
This article presents the results of a pivotal Phase 3 study that assesses a new treatment for the management of chronic low back pain: a transdermal patch containing the opioid buprenorphine. In this randomized, placebo-controlled study with an enriched enrollment design, the buprenorphine transdermal system (BTDS) was found to be efficacious and generally well tolerated. This enriched, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study evaluated the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of BTDS in opioid-naïve patients who had moderate to severe chronic low back pain. Patients who tolerated and responded to BTDS (10 or 20 mcg/hour) during an open-label run-in period were randomized to continue BTDS 10 or 20 mcg/hour or receive matching placebo. The primary outcome was "average pain over the last 24 hours" at the end of the 12-week double-blind phase, collected on an 11-point scale (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Sleep disturbance (Medical Outcomes Study subscale) and total number of supplemental analgesic tablets used were secondary efficacy variables. Fifty-three percent of patients receiving open-label BTDS (541 of 1024) were randomized to receive BTDS (n=257) or placebo (n=284). Patients receiving BTDS reported statistically significantly lower pain scores at Week 12 compared with placebo (least square mean treatment difference: -0.58, P=0.010). Sensitivity analyses of the primary efficacy variable and results of the analysis of secondary efficacy variables supported the efficacy of BTDS relative to placebo. During the double-blind phase, the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was 55% for the BTDS treatment group and 52% for the placebo treatment group. Laboratory, vital sign, and electrocardiogram evaluations did not reveal unanticipated safety findings. BTDS was efficacious in the treatment of opioid-naïve patients with moderate to severe chronic low back pain. Most treatment-emergent adverse events observed were consistent with those associated with the use of opioid agonists and transdermal patches.
This article presents the results of a pivotal Phase 3 study that assesses a new treatment for the management of chronic low back pain: a transdermal patch containing the opioid buprenorphine. In this randomized, placebo-controlled study with an enriched enrollment design, the buprenorphine transdermal system (BTDS) was found to be efficacious and generally well tolerated. This enriched, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study evaluated the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of BTDS in opioid-naïve patients who had moderate to severe chronic low back pain. Patients who tolerated and responded to BTDS (10 or 20 mcg/hour) during an open-label run-in period were randomized to continue BTDS 10 or 20 mcg/hour or receive matching placebo. The primary outcome was “average pain over the last 24 hours” at the end of the 12-week double-blind phase, collected on an 11-point scale (0 = no pain, 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine). Sleep disturbance (Medical Outcomes Study subscale) and total number of supplemental analgesic tablets used were secondary efficacy variables. Fifty-three percent of patients receiving open-label BTDS (541 of 1024) were randomized to receive BTDS ( n = 257) or placebo ( n = 284). Patients receiving BTDS reported statistically significantly lower pain scores at Week 12 compared with placebo (least square mean treatment difference: −0.58, P = 0.010). Sensitivity analyses of the primary efficacy variable and results of the analysis of secondary efficacy variables supported the efficacy of BTDS relative to placebo. During the double-blind phase, the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was 55% for the BTDS treatment group and 52% for the placebo treatment group. Laboratory, vital sign, and electrocardiogram evaluations did not reveal unanticipated safety findings. BTDS was efficacious in the treatment of opioid-naïve patients with moderate to severe chronic low back pain. Most treatment-emergent adverse events observed were consistent with those associated with the use of opioid agonists and transdermal patches.
This article presents the results of a pivotal Phase 3 study that assesses a new treatment for the management of chronic low back pain: a transdermal patch containing the opioid buprenorphine. In this randomized, placebo-controlled study with an enriched enrollment design, the buprenorphine transdermal system (BTDS) was found to be efficacious and generally well tolerated.CONTEXTThis article presents the results of a pivotal Phase 3 study that assesses a new treatment for the management of chronic low back pain: a transdermal patch containing the opioid buprenorphine. In this randomized, placebo-controlled study with an enriched enrollment design, the buprenorphine transdermal system (BTDS) was found to be efficacious and generally well tolerated.This enriched, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study evaluated the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of BTDS in opioid-naïve patients who had moderate to severe chronic low back pain.OBJECTIVESThis enriched, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study evaluated the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of BTDS in opioid-naïve patients who had moderate to severe chronic low back pain.Patients who tolerated and responded to BTDS (10 or 20 mcg/hour) during an open-label run-in period were randomized to continue BTDS 10 or 20 mcg/hour or receive matching placebo. The primary outcome was "average pain over the last 24 hours" at the end of the 12-week double-blind phase, collected on an 11-point scale (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Sleep disturbance (Medical Outcomes Study subscale) and total number of supplemental analgesic tablets used were secondary efficacy variables.METHODSPatients who tolerated and responded to BTDS (10 or 20 mcg/hour) during an open-label run-in period were randomized to continue BTDS 10 or 20 mcg/hour or receive matching placebo. The primary outcome was "average pain over the last 24 hours" at the end of the 12-week double-blind phase, collected on an 11-point scale (0=no pain, 10=pain as bad as you can imagine). Sleep disturbance (Medical Outcomes Study subscale) and total number of supplemental analgesic tablets used were secondary efficacy variables.Fifty-three percent of patients receiving open-label BTDS (541 of 1024) were randomized to receive BTDS (n=257) or placebo (n=284). Patients receiving BTDS reported statistically significantly lower pain scores at Week 12 compared with placebo (least square mean treatment difference: -0.58, P=0.010). Sensitivity analyses of the primary efficacy variable and results of the analysis of secondary efficacy variables supported the efficacy of BTDS relative to placebo. During the double-blind phase, the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was 55% for the BTDS treatment group and 52% for the placebo treatment group. Laboratory, vital sign, and electrocardiogram evaluations did not reveal unanticipated safety findings.RESULTSFifty-three percent of patients receiving open-label BTDS (541 of 1024) were randomized to receive BTDS (n=257) or placebo (n=284). Patients receiving BTDS reported statistically significantly lower pain scores at Week 12 compared with placebo (least square mean treatment difference: -0.58, P=0.010). Sensitivity analyses of the primary efficacy variable and results of the analysis of secondary efficacy variables supported the efficacy of BTDS relative to placebo. During the double-blind phase, the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was 55% for the BTDS treatment group and 52% for the placebo treatment group. Laboratory, vital sign, and electrocardiogram evaluations did not reveal unanticipated safety findings.BTDS was efficacious in the treatment of opioid-naïve patients with moderate to severe chronic low back pain. Most treatment-emergent adverse events observed were consistent with those associated with the use of opioid agonists and transdermal patches.CONCLUSIONBTDS was efficacious in the treatment of opioid-naïve patients with moderate to severe chronic low back pain. Most treatment-emergent adverse events observed were consistent with those associated with the use of opioid agonists and transdermal patches.
Abstract Context This article presents the results of a pivotal Phase 3 study that assesses a new treatment for the management of chronic low back pain: a transdermal patch containing the opioid buprenorphine. In this randomized, placebo-controlled study with an enriched enrollment design, the buprenorphine transdermal system (BTDS) was found to be efficacious and generally well tolerated. Objectives This enriched, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study evaluated the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of BTDS in opioid-naïve patients who had moderate to severe chronic low back pain. Methods Patients who tolerated and responded to BTDS (10 or 20 mcg/hour) during an open-label run-in period were randomized to continue BTDS 10 or 20 mcg/hour or receive matching placebo. The primary outcome was “average pain over the last 24 hours” at the end of the 12-week double-blind phase, collected on an 11-point scale (0 = no pain, 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine). Sleep disturbance (Medical Outcomes Study subscale) and total number of supplemental analgesic tablets used were secondary efficacy variables. Results Fifty-three percent of patients receiving open-label BTDS (541 of 1024) were randomized to receive BTDS ( n = 257) or placebo ( n = 284). Patients receiving BTDS reported statistically significantly lower pain scores at Week 12 compared with placebo (least square mean treatment difference: −0.58, P = 0.010). Sensitivity analyses of the primary efficacy variable and results of the analysis of secondary efficacy variables supported the efficacy of BTDS relative to placebo. During the double-blind phase, the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was 55% for the BTDS treatment group and 52% for the placebo treatment group. Laboratory, vital sign, and electrocardiogram evaluations did not reveal unanticipated safety findings. Conclusion BTDS was efficacious in the treatment of opioid-naïve patients with moderate to severe chronic low back pain. Most treatment-emergent adverse events observed were consistent with those associated with the use of opioid agonists and transdermal patches.
Author Wen, Warren
Sawyerr, Gosford
Munera, Catherine
Sitar, Steve
Landau, Craig
Steiner, Deborah J.
Ripa, Steven R.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Deborah J.
  surname: Steiner
  fullname: Steiner, Deborah J.
  email: Deborah.Steiner@pharma.com
  organization: Purdue Pharma L.P., Stamford, Connecticut, USA
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Steve
  surname: Sitar
  fullname: Sitar, Steve
  organization: Orange County Clinical Trials, Anaheim, California, USA
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Warren
  surname: Wen
  fullname: Wen, Warren
  organization: Purdue Pharma L.P., Stamford, Connecticut, USA
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Gosford
  surname: Sawyerr
  fullname: Sawyerr, Gosford
  organization: Purdue Pharma L.P., Stamford, Connecticut, USA
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Catherine
  surname: Munera
  fullname: Munera, Catherine
  organization: Purdue Pharma L.P., Stamford, Connecticut, USA
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Steven R.
  surname: Ripa
  fullname: Ripa, Steven R.
  organization: Purdue Pharma L.P., Stamford, Connecticut, USA
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Craig
  surname: Landau
  fullname: Landau, Craig
  organization: Purdue Pharma L.P., Stamford, Connecticut, USA
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25305406$$DView record in Pascal Francis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21945130$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNkstu1DAYhSNURC_wCsgsECzI8DvXcRegdjpcpIFWTFlbjvNH42liD7YzVXgpHoI9z4TTi0CVQF35ou8_PvI5-9GONhqj6BmFCQVavF5P1huhtBu6TuhJApROIJsAFA-iPTot07jIaboT7cF0mscpS7LdaN-5NQDkaZE-inYTyrKAwF70a940Sgo5EKFrshQN-oGYhvgVkiVuUccnYiDH_caiNnazUhrJuRXa1Wg70ZLl4Dx2RGlyulFG1fFn8fPHFsmZ8Aq1d-RS-RX5ZAIuPBJvrlQtktnKGq0kWZhLcizkRZhQ-pAcaTLXVskV1q_Il-DJdOr7uD8xfdVifNwqHU5nrZBYmXhmtLembTF49309PI4eNqJ1-ORmPYi-vpufzz7Ei9P3H2dHi1jmeeLjXJZFUZU5ZphWWVKmgAmWjGJTQpMzUbKqYJQJREgLmlTTJgGoxjtBscI6PYheXOturPnWo_O8U05i2wqNpnecQYiBsSwJ5Mv_khSSFFgRLAT06Q3aVx3WfGNVJ-zAb9MKwPMbQDgp2ibkIJX7w-Up5BkUgXt7zUlrnLPYcKl8CGT8LKHa8CYfe8TX_K8e8bFHHDIOVwrsjsLtI_eZnV3PYghgq9ByJ0MXJNbKovS8NupeKm_uqMgQfahqe4EDurXprQ4Jc8pdwoEvx66PVacUQmaMBoGjfwvc08RvNegX2w
CODEN JSPME2
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpainsymman_2013_03_001
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_smrv_2022_101672
crossref_primary_10_1080_00325481_2017_1269596
crossref_primary_10_1093_pm_pnx235
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpain_2012_09_016
crossref_primary_10_1111_pme_12656
crossref_primary_10_4155_tde_15_3
crossref_primary_10_1089_jpm_2014_9438
crossref_primary_10_2147_JPR_S334840
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40265_018_0953_z
crossref_primary_10_1080_14737175_2018_1462701
crossref_primary_10_1007_s15006_013_2188_y
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpainsymman_2012_06_014
crossref_primary_10_1080_14656566_2020_1817384
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_drudis_2018_06_004
crossref_primary_10_1517_14656566_2013_767331
crossref_primary_10_1111_papr_12298
crossref_primary_10_2147_JPR_S305146
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aat_2015_06_001
crossref_primary_10_1111_pme_12386
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bja_2022_05_031
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10787_018_0493_x
crossref_primary_10_4184_asj_2017_11_4_653
crossref_primary_10_1080_00325481_2017_1270699
crossref_primary_10_4103_ijpn_ijpn_4_18
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_amjms_2022_06_025
crossref_primary_10_1080_00325481_2014_992715
crossref_primary_10_1080_14740338_2021_1921142
crossref_primary_10_2147_JPR_S226483
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2022_068182
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40266_022_00946_x
crossref_primary_10_1097_ALN_0000000000000170
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pain_2013_05_004
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12891_023_06537_0
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40122_019_0126_0
crossref_primary_10_1177_20494637231216352
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bpa_2020_06_005
crossref_primary_10_1097_BRS_0000000000000249
crossref_primary_10_5055_jom_2014_0233
crossref_primary_10_1185_03007995_2012_731387
crossref_primary_10_1213_ANE_0000000000006467
crossref_primary_10_1185_03007995_2014_901941
crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD010323_pub3
crossref_primary_10_1111_papr_12281
crossref_primary_10_1001_jamainternmed_2016_1251
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00482_014_1449_8
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13018_024_04741_9
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40266_022_00953_y
crossref_primary_10_1097_j_pain_0000000000002423
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40271_015_0151_y
crossref_primary_10_4103_roaic_roaic_6_18
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jos_2021_06_024
crossref_primary_10_1097_j_pain_0000000000000088
crossref_primary_10_1097_j_pain_0000000000002462
crossref_primary_10_47102_annals_acadmedsg_V42N3p138
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinthera_2013_09_008
crossref_primary_10_1080_00325481_2016_1128307
crossref_primary_10_1097_AJP_0000000000000068
crossref_primary_10_1001_jama_2018_18472
crossref_primary_10_1111_papr_12156
crossref_primary_10_1111_papr_12155
crossref_primary_10_1002_14651858_CD004959_pub4
crossref_primary_10_1002_2327_6924_12155
crossref_primary_10_1002_ejp_1519
crossref_primary_10_1213_ANE_0000000000002718
crossref_primary_10_1097_j_pain_0000000000002654
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12891_015_0825_6
crossref_primary_10_2217_pmt_2020_0013
crossref_primary_10_1517_14656566_2012_667073
crossref_primary_10_1080_17512433_2021_1903316
crossref_primary_10_1111_papr_13201
crossref_primary_10_1517_14728214_2015_993379
crossref_primary_10_1002_pst_1767
crossref_primary_10_1080_00325481_2017_1270156
Cites_doi 10.5055/jom.2010.0017
10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00349-9
10.7326/0003-4819-154-2-201101180-00010
10.1111/j.1533-2500.2008.00232.x
10.1016/j.spinee.2007.10.005
10.7326/0003-4819-147-7-200710020-00006
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2004.07.005
10.5055/jom.2007.0038
10.1016/j.pain.2008.01.014
10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.10.010
10.1185/030079905X65303
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2011 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee
U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee
2015 INIST-CNRS
Copyright © 2011 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2011 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee
– notice: U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee
– notice: 2015 INIST-CNRS
– notice: Copyright © 2011 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QJ
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006
DatabaseName CrossRef
Pascal-Francis
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA)
MEDLINE

MEDLINE - Academic


Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1873-6513
EndPage 917
ExternalDocumentID 21945130
25305406
10_1016_j_jpainsymman_2011_04_006
S0885392411003691
1_s2_0_S0885392411003691
Genre Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
..I
.1-
.FO
.GJ
.~1
0R~
1B1
1P~
1RT
1~.
1~5
29L
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
7-5
71M
8P~
9JM
AABNK
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAFWJ
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQQT
AAQXK
AATTM
AAWTL
AAXKI
AAXLA
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABBQC
ABCQJ
ABFNM
ABFRF
ABIVO
ABJNI
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABWVN
ABXDB
ACDAQ
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIEU
ACIUM
ACJTP
ACRLP
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADEZE
ADMUD
ADNMO
ADVLN
AEBSH
AEFWE
AEIPS
AEKER
AENEX
AEUPX
AEVXI
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AFRHN
AFTJW
AFXBA
AFXIZ
AGCQF
AGHFR
AGQPQ
AGUBO
AGWIK
AGYEJ
AHHHB
AIEXJ
AIGII
AIIUN
AIKHN
AITUG
AJRQY
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
ANKPU
ANZVX
APXCP
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
BKOJK
BLXMC
BNPGV
BR6
CS3
DU5
EBS
EFJIC
EFKBS
EJD
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
EX3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FRJ
FYGXN
G-2
G-Q
GBLVA
HDV
HMK
HMO
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
J5H
KOM
LX1
M29
M2W
M41
MO0
MOBAO
N9A
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OG.
OK1
OS-
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
Q38
QTD
R2-
ROL
RPZ
SAE
SCC
SDF
SDG
SDP
SEL
SES
SEW
SNG
SNH
SPCBC
SSH
SSN
SSZ
T5K
TR2
UV1
WOW
WUQ
YYQ
Z5R
ZGI
ZXP
~G-
AACTN
AFCTW
AFKWA
AJOXV
AMFUW
NCXOZ
RIG
AADPK
AAIAV
ABLVK
ABVKL
ABYKQ
AISVY
AJBFU
EFLBG
LCYCR
NAHTW
AAYXX
AGRNS
CITATION
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QJ
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c552t-5c766b75e4e3b42730e2e791ef70f59a79b6919aee03612b8f200bb691a1ebed3
IEDL.DBID .~1
ISSN 0885-3924
1873-6513
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 06:50:42 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 09:47:22 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:00:08 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 09:15:24 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:10:45 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:54:38 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:35:20 EST 2024
Sun Feb 23 10:19:45 EST 2025
Tue Aug 26 17:11:42 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Keywords chronic low back pain
enrichment
Buprenorphine
randomized controlled trials
transdermal
Enrichment
Lumbar spine
Toxicity
Low back pain
Diseases of the osteoarticular system
Opiates
Spine disease
Narcotic analgesic
Opioid peptide
Percutaneous route
Randomization
Pain
Rachialgia
Safety
Delivery system
Human
Transdermal system
Treatment efficiency
Randomized controlled trial
Chronic
Placebo
Dosage form
Double blind study
Language English
License http://www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0
https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0
CC BY 4.0
Copyright © 2011 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c552t-5c766b75e4e3b42730e2e791ef70f59a79b6919aee03612b8f200bb691a1ebed3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
OpenAccessLink https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0885392411003691
PMID 21945130
PQID 1023096730
PQPubID 24071
PageCount 15
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_908739942
proquest_miscellaneous_1023096730
pubmed_primary_21945130
pascalfrancis_primary_25305406
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_jpainsymman_2011_04_006
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpainsymman_2011_04_006
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_jpainsymman_2011_04_006
elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0885392411003691
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_jpainsymman_2011_04_006
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2011-12-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2011-12-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2011
  text: 2011-12-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace New York, NY
PublicationPlace_xml – name: New York, NY
– name: United States
PublicationTitle Journal of pain and symptom management
PublicationTitleAlternate J Pain Symptom Manage
PublicationYear 2011
Publisher Elsevier Inc
Elsevier
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Inc
– name: Elsevier
References Dworkin, Turk, Wyrwich (bib20) 2008; 9
Chou, Qaseem, Snow (bib4) 2007; 147
National Research Council (bib15) 2010
Kalso, Allan, Dobrogowski (bib5) 2005; 21
Vadivelu, Hines (bib8) 2007; 3
US National Institutes of Health. Buprenorphine transdermal system (BTDS) in subjects with moderate to severe chronic low back pain. Available from
McQuay, Derry, Moore, Poulain, Legout (bib18) 2008; 135
Dagenais, Caro, Haldeman (bib1) 2008; 8
Landau, Carr, Razzetti (bib21) 2007; 29
Trescot, Helm, Hansen (bib6) 2008; 11
Munera, Drehobl, Sessler, Landau (bib17) 2010; 6
Accessed March 24, 2010.
Holm (bib14) 1979; 6
(bib11) 2005
Nicholson (bib2) 2009; 9
Fleming (bib16) 2011; 154
Buprenorfina (bib10) 2009
Temgesic (bib9) 2009
Farrar, Young, LaMoreaux, Werth, Poole (bib19) 2001; 94
Johnson, Fudala, Payne (bib7) 2005; 29
Hays, Stewart (bib13) 1992
Chou, Fanciullo, Fine (bib3) 2009; 10
Fleming (10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006_bib16) 2011; 154
Dagenais (10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006_bib1) 2008; 8
Buprenorfina (10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006_bib10) 2009
Trescot (10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006_bib6) 2008; 11
(10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006_bib11) 2005
Munera (10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006_bib17) 2010; 6
National Research Council (10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006_bib15) 2010
Vadivelu (10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006_bib8) 2007; 3
Johnson (10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006_bib7) 2005; 29
Hays (10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006_bib13) 1992
McQuay (10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006_bib18) 2008; 135
Dworkin (10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006_bib20) 2008; 9
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006_bib12
Holm (10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006_bib14) 1979; 6
Kalso (10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006_bib5) 2005; 21
Chou (10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006_bib3) 2009; 10
Landau (10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006_bib21) 2007; 29
Temgesic (10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006_bib9) 2009
Nicholson (10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006_bib2) 2009; 9
Farrar (10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006_bib19) 2001; 94
Chou (10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006_bib4) 2007; 147
References_xml – volume: 147
  start-page: 478
  year: 2007
  end-page: 491
  ident: bib4
  article-title: Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: a joint clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society
  publication-title: Ann Intern Med
– volume: 3
  start-page: 49
  year: 2007
  end-page: 58
  ident: bib8
  article-title: Buprenorphine: a unique opioid with broad clinical applications
  publication-title: J Opioid Manag
– volume: 10
  start-page: 113
  year: 2009
  end-page: 130
  ident: bib3
  article-title: Opioid treatment guidelines: clinical guidelines for the use of chronic opioid therapy in chronic noncancer pain
  publication-title: J Pain
– volume: 6
  start-page: 65
  year: 1979
  end-page: 70
  ident: bib14
  article-title: A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure
  publication-title: Scand J Stat
– year: 2010
  ident: bib15
  article-title: The prevention and treatment of missing data in clinical trials: Panel on handling missing data in clinical trials
– volume: 8
  start-page: 8
  year: 2008
  end-page: 20
  ident: bib1
  article-title: A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally
  publication-title: Spine J
– volume: 11
  start-page: S5
  year: 2008
  end-page: S62
  ident: bib6
  article-title: Opioids in the management of chronic non-cancer pain: an update of the American Society of the Interventional Pain Physicians’ (ASIPP) guidelines
  publication-title: Pain Physician
– volume: 29
  start-page: 2179
  year: 2007
  end-page: 2193
  ident: bib21
  article-title: Buprenorphine transdermal delivery system in adults with persistent noncancer-related pain syndromes who require opioid therapy: a multicenter, 5-week run-in and randomized, double-blind maintenance-of-analgesia study
  publication-title: Clin Ther
– volume: 9
  start-page: 71
  year: 2009
  end-page: 81
  ident: bib2
  article-title: Benefits of extended-release opioid analgesic formulations in the treatment of chronic pain
  publication-title: Pain Pract
– volume: 21
  start-page: 1819
  year: 2005
  end-page: 1828
  ident: bib5
  article-title: Do strong opioids have a role in the early management of back pain? Recommendations from a European expert panel
  publication-title: Curr Med Res Opin
– start-page: 235
  year: 1992
  end-page: 259
  ident: bib13
  article-title: Sleep measures
  publication-title: Measuring functioning and well-being: The medical outcomes study approach
– volume: 154
  start-page: 113
  year: 2011
  end-page: 117
  ident: bib16
  article-title: Addressing missing data in clinical trials
  publication-title: Ann Intern Med
– volume: 135
  start-page: 217
  year: 2008
  end-page: 220
  ident: bib18
  article-title: Enriched enrolment with randomised withdrawal (EERW): time for a new look at clinical trial design in chronic pain
  publication-title: Pain
– volume: 94
  start-page: 149
  year: 2001
  end-page: 158
  ident: bib19
  article-title: Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale
  publication-title: Pain
– year: 2009
  ident: bib10
  article-title: Catálogo de medicamentos, 2009
– reference: . Accessed March 24, 2010.
– year: 2005
  ident: bib11
  article-title: Buprenex
– volume: 9
  start-page: 105
  year: 2008
  end-page: 121
  ident: bib20
  article-title: Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations
  publication-title: J Pain
– volume: 29
  start-page: 297
  year: 2005
  end-page: 326
  ident: bib7
  article-title: Buprenorphine: considerations for pain management
  publication-title: J Pain Symptom Manage
– volume: 6
  start-page: 193
  year: 2010
  end-page: 202
  ident: bib17
  article-title: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, parallel-group, 5-week study of buprenorphine transdermal system in adults with osteoarthritis
  publication-title: J Opioid Manag
– reference: US National Institutes of Health. Buprenorphine transdermal system (BTDS) in subjects with moderate to severe chronic low back pain. Available from
– year: 2009
  ident: bib9
  article-title: L’informatore farmaceutico M-Z
– year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006_bib10
– volume: 10
  start-page: 113
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006_bib3
  article-title: Opioid treatment guidelines: clinical guidelines for the use of chronic opioid therapy in chronic noncancer pain
  publication-title: J Pain
– volume: 6
  start-page: 193
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006_bib17
  article-title: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, parallel-group, 5-week study of buprenorphine transdermal system in adults with osteoarthritis
  publication-title: J Opioid Manag
  doi: 10.5055/jom.2010.0017
– volume: 94
  start-page: 149
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006_bib19
  article-title: Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale
  publication-title: Pain
  doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00349-9
– volume: 154
  start-page: 113
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006_bib16
  article-title: Addressing missing data in clinical trials
  publication-title: Ann Intern Med
  doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-2-201101180-00010
– volume: 9
  start-page: 71
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006_bib2
  article-title: Benefits of extended-release opioid analgesic formulations in the treatment of chronic pain
  publication-title: Pain Pract
  doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2008.00232.x
– volume: 11
  start-page: S5
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006_bib6
  article-title: Opioids in the management of chronic non-cancer pain: an update of the American Society of the Interventional Pain Physicians’ (ASIPP) guidelines
  publication-title: Pain Physician
– volume: 8
  start-page: 8
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006_bib1
  article-title: A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally
  publication-title: Spine J
  doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.10.005
– volume: 6
  start-page: 65
  year: 1979
  ident: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006_bib14
  article-title: A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure
  publication-title: Scand J Stat
– year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006_bib15
– year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006_bib11
– ident: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006_bib12
– volume: 9
  start-page: 105
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006_bib20
  article-title: Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations
  publication-title: J Pain
– volume: 147
  start-page: 478
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006_bib4
  article-title: Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: a joint clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society
  publication-title: Ann Intern Med
  doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-7-200710020-00006
– volume: 29
  start-page: 297
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006_bib7
  article-title: Buprenorphine: considerations for pain management
  publication-title: J Pain Symptom Manage
  doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2004.07.005
– volume: 3
  start-page: 49
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006_bib8
  article-title: Buprenorphine: a unique opioid with broad clinical applications
  publication-title: J Opioid Manag
  doi: 10.5055/jom.2007.0038
– volume: 135
  start-page: 217
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006_bib18
  article-title: Enriched enrolment with randomised withdrawal (EERW): time for a new look at clinical trial design in chronic pain
  publication-title: Pain
  doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.01.014
– volume: 29
  start-page: 2179
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006_bib21
  article-title: Buprenorphine transdermal delivery system in adults with persistent noncancer-related pain syndromes who require opioid therapy: a multicenter, 5-week run-in and randomized, double-blind maintenance-of-analgesia study
  publication-title: Clin Ther
  doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.10.010
– year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006_bib9
– volume: 21
  start-page: 1819
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006_bib5
  article-title: Do strong opioids have a role in the early management of back pain? Recommendations from a European expert panel
  publication-title: Curr Med Res Opin
  doi: 10.1185/030079905X65303
– start-page: 235
  year: 1992
  ident: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006_bib13
  article-title: Sleep measures
SSID ssj0005363
Score 2.3343291
Snippet This article presents the results of a pivotal Phase 3 study that assesses a new treatment for the management of chronic low back pain: a transdermal patch...
Abstract Context This article presents the results of a pivotal Phase 3 study that assesses a new treatment for the management of chronic low back pain: a...
Context. This article presents the results of a pivotal Phase 3 study that assesses a new treatment for the management of chronic low back pain: a transdermal...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
pascalfrancis
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 903
SubjectTerms Administration, Cutaneous
Adult
Aged
Analgesics, Opioid - administration & dosage
Analgesics, Opioid - adverse effects
Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use
Anesthesia & Perioperative Care
Biological and medical sciences
Buprenorphine
Buprenorphine - administration & dosage
Buprenorphine - adverse effects
Buprenorphine - therapeutic use
Chronic low back pain
Chronic pain
Diseases of the osteoarticular system
Diseases of the spine
Double-Blind Method
Efficacy
Electrocardiography
enrichment
Female
Humans
Low Back Pain - drug therapy
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Opioids
Pain Measurement
Pain Medicine
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
randomized controlled trials
Safety
transdermal
Treatment Outcome
Title Efficacy and Safety of the Seven-Day Buprenorphine Transdermal System in Opioid-Naïve Patients with Moderate to Severe Chronic Low Back Pain: An Enriched, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0885392411003691
https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0885392411003691
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21945130
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1023096730
https://www.proquest.com/docview/908739942
Volume 42
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1bb9MwFLamIU1ICHEnXKoziUdMc3HieOKlLZ3KZWWiTNqb5SSOlNEmVdOCygN_iR_BO7-J41y6TVCpEm9t5JM4Phd_do6_Q8gLV7iII7SgYRrFlDGR0Ihzn4aJy5PUS2LGzNnhk3EwOmPvzv3zPTJoz8KYtMom9tcxvYrWzZVuM5rdeZZ1J-gfPs7uzJCeeUF9gp1xY-WvflxJ8_DqamrYmJrWB-TwMsfrYo7L73I9m6m8YfM0XNrBtjnq1lyVOHJpXfJiOyat5qbjO-R2AyqhV_f7LtnT-T1ycNJ8Nr9Pfg8NUYSK16DyBCYq1cs1FCkg-IOJoXCib9Qa-ivDb1ngwKMQVJNYYuL2FGpac8hy-DjPiiyhY_Xr51cNpzUpawlmNxeqsmoIXWFZVHddaGiod-FD8Q36Kv6CEll-BL0chvnCJKEmL-ET9qmYZd_Nb4Tz0VTTPmJf_Hdqtvijgg7qdPqpxr4bNtwH5Ox4-Hkwok0hBxr7vrukfsyDIOK-ZtqLGAImW7uaC0en3E59obiIUH9CaY2KdNwoTNF3I3NNOWhkifeQ7OdFrh8T8FLX85jGdSveCcGgiHFFpBIn1BirlJ1aJGxVJ-OG5dwU25jKNp3tQl7RujRalzaTqHWLuBvReU31sYvQUWsfsj3LitFX4oS0izD_l7AumzhSSkeWrrTlX7ZukdcbyWvusuuDO9dMefO-ru8ZDI8NDlvblhhvzEckletihT0yi1YRoA4tAlvaCDvkCHyZa5FHtV9cPsARzEfc9OT_XuApuVlt7ld5Rc_I_nKx0s8RHS6jTuX-HXKj9_b9aPwH4nRojQ
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1bb9MwFLamThpIaOJOB4wziUes5mLnMvHSlk4da8tEN2lvlpM4UkabVE0LKn-KH8E7v4njXFomqFSJtzbySRyf43M-O8ffIeSt5VuII5RPvTgIKWN-RAPX5dSLLDeK7ShkTJ8dHo6c_jX7eMNv9ki3Pguj0yor31_69MJbV1da1Wi2ZknSGuP84BjdmSY9sx19gn1fs1PxBtlvn1_0R5tMD7ssqIbtqRY4ICebNK_bGa7A89V0KtOK0FPTaTvbwtSDmcxx8OKy6sV2WFqEp7OH5LDCldAuu_6I7Kn0MTkYVl_On5BfPc0VIcMVyDSCsYzVYgVZDIj_YKxZnOgHuYLOUlNcZjj2KARFHIu0655AyWwOSQqfZkmWRHQkf_74quCy5GXNQW_oQlFZDdErLLLirnMFFfsuDLJv0JHhF5RI0lNop9BL5zoPNXoHn7FP2TT5rn8jog8minYQ_uK_S73LH2S0W2bUTxT2XRPiPiXXZ72rbp9WtRxoyLm1oDx0HSdwuWLKDhhiJkNZyvVNFbtGzH3p-gGq0JdKoS5NK_BinL6BviZNtLPIfkYaaZaqFwTs2LJtpnDpindCPOiHuCiSkekpdFfSiJvEq1UnworoXNfbmIg6o-1W_KF1obUuDCZQ601irUVnJdvHLkKntX2I-jgrOmCBMWkXYfdfwiqvXEkuTJFbwhB_mXuTvF9L3pkxuz74-I4pr9_X4raG8djgpLZtgS5Hf0eSqcqW2CO9bvUd1GGTwJY2vuG5iH2Z1STPy3mxeYDpM47Q6ej_XuANude_Gg7E4Hx08ZLcL_b6izSjV6SxmC_VawSLi-C4cga_Af30az4
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy+and+Safety+of+the+Seven-Day+Buprenorphine+Transdermal+System+in+Opioid-Na%C3%AFve+Patients+with+Moderate+to+Severe+Chronic+Low+Back+Pain%3A+An+Enriched%2C+Randomized%2C+Double-Blind%2C+Placebo-Controlled+Study&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+pain+and+symptom+management&rft.au=Steiner%2C+Deborah+J.&rft.au=Sitar%2C+Steve&rft.au=Wen%2C+Warren&rft.au=Sawyerr%2C+Gosford&rft.date=2011-12-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Inc&rft.issn=0885-3924&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=903&rft.epage=917&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.jpainsymman.2011.04.006&rft.externalDocID=S0885392411003691
thumbnail_m http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F08853924%2FS0885392411X0012X%2Fcov150h.gif