Efficacy and Safety of the Seven-Day Buprenorphine Transdermal System in Opioid-Naïve Patients with Moderate to Severe Chronic Low Back Pain: An Enriched, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

This article presents the results of a pivotal Phase 3 study that assesses a new treatment for the management of chronic low back pain: a transdermal patch containing the opioid buprenorphine. In this randomized, placebo-controlled study with an enriched enrollment design, the buprenorphine transder...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of pain and symptom management Vol. 42; no. 6; pp. 903 - 917
Main Authors Steiner, Deborah J., Sitar, Steve, Wen, Warren, Sawyerr, Gosford, Munera, Catherine, Ripa, Steven R., Landau, Craig
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.12.2011
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This article presents the results of a pivotal Phase 3 study that assesses a new treatment for the management of chronic low back pain: a transdermal patch containing the opioid buprenorphine. In this randomized, placebo-controlled study with an enriched enrollment design, the buprenorphine transdermal system (BTDS) was found to be efficacious and generally well tolerated. This enriched, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study evaluated the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of BTDS in opioid-naïve patients who had moderate to severe chronic low back pain. Patients who tolerated and responded to BTDS (10 or 20 mcg/hour) during an open-label run-in period were randomized to continue BTDS 10 or 20 mcg/hour or receive matching placebo. The primary outcome was “average pain over the last 24 hours” at the end of the 12-week double-blind phase, collected on an 11-point scale (0 = no pain, 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine). Sleep disturbance (Medical Outcomes Study subscale) and total number of supplemental analgesic tablets used were secondary efficacy variables. Fifty-three percent of patients receiving open-label BTDS (541 of 1024) were randomized to receive BTDS ( n = 257) or placebo ( n = 284). Patients receiving BTDS reported statistically significantly lower pain scores at Week 12 compared with placebo (least square mean treatment difference: −0.58, P = 0.010). Sensitivity analyses of the primary efficacy variable and results of the analysis of secondary efficacy variables supported the efficacy of BTDS relative to placebo. During the double-blind phase, the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was 55% for the BTDS treatment group and 52% for the placebo treatment group. Laboratory, vital sign, and electrocardiogram evaluations did not reveal unanticipated safety findings. BTDS was efficacious in the treatment of opioid-naïve patients with moderate to severe chronic low back pain. Most treatment-emergent adverse events observed were consistent with those associated with the use of opioid agonists and transdermal patches.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0885-3924
1873-6513
1873-6513
DOI:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.04.006