Functional MRI at 1.5 Tesla: A Comparison of the Blood Oxygenation Level-Dependent Signal and Electrophysiology

How well does the functional MRI (fMRI) signal reflect underlying electrophysiology? Despite the ubiquity of the technique, this question has yet to be adequately answered. Therefore, we have compared cortical maps generated based on the indirect blood oxygenation level-dependent signal of fMRI with...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 97; no. 17; pp. 9718 - 9723
Main Authors Disbrow, Elizabeth A., Slutsky, Daniel A., Timothy P. L. Roberts, Krubitzer, Leah A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 15.08.2000
National Acad Sciences
National Academy of Sciences
The National Academy of Sciences
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:How well does the functional MRI (fMRI) signal reflect underlying electrophysiology? Despite the ubiquity of the technique, this question has yet to be adequately answered. Therefore, we have compared cortical maps generated based on the indirect blood oxygenation level-dependent signal of fMRI with maps from microelectrode recording techniques, which directly measure neural activity. Identical somatosensory stimuli were used in both sets of experiments in the same anesthetized macaque monkeys. Our results demonstrate that fMRI can be used to determine the topographic organization of cortical fields with 55% concordance to electrophysiological maps. The variance in the location of fMRI activation was greatest in the plane perpendicular to local vessels. An appreciation of the limitations of fMRI improves our ability to use it effectively to study cortical organization.
Bibliography:Edited by Dale Purves, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, and approved June 20, 2000
To whom reprint requests should be addressed. E-mail: lakrubitzer@ucdavis.edu.
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.170205497