Can CSF biomarkers or pre-treatment progression rate predict response to cholinesterase inhibitor treatment in Alzheimer's disease?

Objective The main objective of this study was to investigate possible predictors of response to cholinesterase inhibitor (ChEI) treatment, including pre‐treatment progression rates and levels of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers. A secondary objective was to evaluate whether treatment with C...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of geriatric psychiatry Vol. 24; no. 6; pp. 638 - 647
Main Authors Wallin, Å. K., Hansson, O., Blennow, K., Londos, E., Minthon, L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 01.06.2009
Psychology Press
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective The main objective of this study was to investigate possible predictors of response to cholinesterase inhibitor (ChEI) treatment, including pre‐treatment progression rates and levels of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers. A secondary objective was to evaluate whether treatment with ChEI changed progression. Methods Out‐patient individuals (n = 191) with the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease received ChEI treatment and were part of the Swedish Alzheimer Treatment Study (SATS), a prospective, longitudinal, non‐randomised study in a routine clinical setting. Patients were assessed with MMSE, ADAS‐cog and a global rating (CIBIC) at baseline, 2 months and every 6 months for a total period of 3 years. The following potential predictors of treatment response were investigated: age, gender, APOE ε4 carrier, education, duration of disease, cognitive level, pre‐treatment progression rate (in MMSE) and the levels of the CSF biomarkers Aβ42, T‐tau and P‐tau. Results Fast pre‐treatment progression rate was a predictor of treatment response even after adjusting for baseline severity, another positive predictor of response. Patients in the fastest quartile of pre‐treatment progression rates were significantly more prone to be responders at 2 months (adjusted OR 6.6, p = 0.001) and 6 months (adjusted OR 10.4, p < 0.001) than those in the slowest progressing quartile. Moreover, the linearity of progression was significantly changed by ChEI treatment at 6 months compared to the pre‐treatment period. Conclusion The rate of pre‐treatment progression was the most consistent positive predictor of ChEI treatment response in the routine clinical setting. The progression rate was significantly changed by ChEI treatment. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliography:Alzheimer Foundation, Sweden
Brain Power, Sweden
ark:/67375/WNG-0SDZWTRS-6
istex:F2DB41A7BC76129C31DE0CF60A7FE2BCE34A1CA6
ArticleID:GPS2195
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0885-6230
1099-1166
1099-1166
DOI:10.1002/gps.2195