Can CSF biomarkers or pre-treatment progression rate predict response to cholinesterase inhibitor treatment in Alzheimer's disease?
Objective The main objective of this study was to investigate possible predictors of response to cholinesterase inhibitor (ChEI) treatment, including pre‐treatment progression rates and levels of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers. A secondary objective was to evaluate whether treatment with C...
Saved in:
Published in | International journal of geriatric psychiatry Vol. 24; no. 6; pp. 638 - 647 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Chichester, UK
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
01.06.2009
Psychology Press Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Objective
The main objective of this study was to investigate possible predictors of response to cholinesterase inhibitor (ChEI) treatment, including pre‐treatment progression rates and levels of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers. A secondary objective was to evaluate whether treatment with ChEI changed progression.
Methods
Out‐patient individuals (n = 191) with the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease received ChEI treatment and were part of the Swedish Alzheimer Treatment Study (SATS), a prospective, longitudinal, non‐randomised study in a routine clinical setting. Patients were assessed with MMSE, ADAS‐cog and a global rating (CIBIC) at baseline, 2 months and every 6 months for a total period of 3 years. The following potential predictors of treatment response were investigated: age, gender, APOE ε4 carrier, education, duration of disease, cognitive level, pre‐treatment progression rate (in MMSE) and the levels of the CSF biomarkers Aβ42, T‐tau and P‐tau.
Results
Fast pre‐treatment progression rate was a predictor of treatment response even after adjusting for baseline severity, another positive predictor of response. Patients in the fastest quartile of pre‐treatment progression rates were significantly more prone to be responders at 2 months (adjusted OR 6.6, p = 0.001) and 6 months (adjusted OR 10.4, p < 0.001) than those in the slowest progressing quartile. Moreover, the linearity of progression was significantly changed by ChEI treatment at 6 months compared to the pre‐treatment period.
Conclusion
The rate of pre‐treatment progression was the most consistent positive predictor of ChEI treatment response in the routine clinical setting. The progression rate was significantly changed by ChEI treatment. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Alzheimer Foundation, Sweden Brain Power, Sweden ark:/67375/WNG-0SDZWTRS-6 istex:F2DB41A7BC76129C31DE0CF60A7FE2BCE34A1CA6 ArticleID:GPS2195 ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 0885-6230 1099-1166 1099-1166 |
DOI: | 10.1002/gps.2195 |