Effects of Clofibrate in the CB6F1-TgHras2 Mice

The tumorigenic potential of clofibrate, a peroxisome proliferator, was evaluated in a 26-week bioassay using CB6F1-TgHras2 (rasH2) mice carrying a human prototype c-Ha-ras gene. Clofibrate was administered to rasH2 mice orally by gavage at doses of 0 (vehicle control), 125, 250 or 500 mg/kg/day for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Toxicologic Pathology Vol. 15; no. 2; p. 111
Main Authors Aoki, Toyohiko, Imai, Toshio, Ando, Tomomi, Dodo, Tetsushi, Kerns, William D., Motooka, Satoru, Tsukidate, Kazuo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Japanese
Published Tokyo JAPANESE SOCIETY OF TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY 2002
The Japanese Society of Toxicologic Pathology
Japan Science and Technology Agency
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The tumorigenic potential of clofibrate, a peroxisome proliferator, was evaluated in a 26-week bioassay using CB6F1-TgHras2 (rasH2) mice carrying a human prototype c-Ha-ras gene. Clofibrate was administered to rasH2 mice orally by gavage at doses of 0 (vehicle control), 125, 250 or 500 mg/kg/day for 26 weeks. Single i.p. injection of 75 mg/kg methyl nitrosourea (MNU) was given to additional rasH2 group as positive control. CB6F1 non-Tg-rasH2 (non-Tg) mice were given either vehicle or 500 mg/kg of clofibrate. In rasH2 mice receiving clofibrate, hepatocellular adenoma was observed in males; 0 (1/15), 125 (0/15), 250 (3/15), and 500 mg/kg (3/15), but not in females. Although the trend test was positive (p<0.01), there was no dose-response and no statistical significance for hepatocellular adenoma. There was no hepatocellular adenoma in non-Tg mice. Increased incidence of neoplastic lesions, e.g. thymic lymphomas, forestomach/skin tumors were found in MNU treated mice as expected. In conclusion, the tumorigenic potential of clofibrate was equivocal in this model, as there was a weak response in the male 250 and 500 mg/kg dose groups but no dose-response. These results indicated further validation of this model as an alternative to the 2-year rodent carcinogenicity bioassay for human carcinogenic safety assessment will be needed.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0914-9198
1881-915X
1347-7404
DOI:10.1293/tox.15.111