Sensory and Nutritional Quality of Split Peas (Pisum Sativum) Stored up to 34 Y in Residential Storage

The sensory and nutritional quality of split peas stored up to 34 y was determined. Nine samples of split peas representing 5 retail brands packaged in Nr 10 cans and stored at room temperature were obtained from donors. Duplicate cans of a fresh sample of split peas were purchased as controls. Can...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of food science Vol. 75; no. 3; pp. S162 - S166
Main Authors Chapman, J.S, Jefferies, L.K, Pike, O.A
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Malden, USA Blackwell Publishing Inc 01.04.2010
Wiley
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The sensory and nutritional quality of split peas stored up to 34 y was determined. Nine samples of split peas representing 5 retail brands packaged in Nr 10 cans and stored at room temperature were obtained from donors. Duplicate cans of a fresh sample of split peas were purchased as controls. Can head space oxygen ranged from 0.255% to 20.1%. Water activity of the raw split peas ranged from 0.41 to 0.56. The green color of the raw split peas decreased over time as shown by increasing CIE a* values. Flavor, appearance, texture, and overall liking hedonic scores (9-point scale) of split-pea soup made from each sample ranged from 3.7 to 6.7 and decreased over time. Hedonic scores for appearance were correlated with the decrease in raw product green color (r²= 0.65). Hedonic scores for soup texture declined over time, which corresponded with increasing hardness of the cooked peas as measured by a TA.XT2 texture analyzer. All samples were judged to be acceptable in an emergency situation by over 75% of sensory panelists. Available thiamin was significantly lower in older samples while riboflavin remained unchanged. The results indicate that split pea quality declines over time, but the product maintains sufficient sensory acceptance to be considered for potential use in emergency storage and other applications where minimal stock rotation is a common practice.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01540.x
istex:56DAB7783F2A4C697E3932A843060E49BFFBF97B
ark:/67375/WNG-15K510TP-V
ArticleID:JFDS1540
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-1147
1750-3841
DOI:10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01540.x