CT findings of COVID-19 in follow-up: comparison between progression and recovery

We aimed to retrospectively analyze the imaging changes detected in the follow-up of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients on thin-section computed tomography (CT). We included 54 patients diagnosed with COVID-19. The mean interval between the initial and follow-up CT scans was 7.82±3.74 days...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) Vol. 26; no. 4; pp. 301 - 307
Main Authors Guan, Chun-Shuang, Wei, Lian-Gui, Xie, Ru-Ming, Lv, Zhi-Bin, Yan, Shuo, Zhang, Zi-Xin, Chen, Bu-Dong
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Turkey Galenos Yayinevi Tic. Ltd 01.07.2020
Aves Yayincilik Ltd. STI
Turkish Society of Radiology
Galenos Publishing House
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We aimed to retrospectively analyze the imaging changes detected in the follow-up of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients on thin-section computed tomography (CT). We included 54 patients diagnosed with COVID-19. The mean interval between the initial and follow-up CT scans was 7.82±3.74 days. Patients were divided into progression and recovery groups according to their outcomes. We evaluated CT images in terms of distribution of lesions and imaging manifestations. The manifestations included ground-glass opacity (GGO), crazy-paving pattern, consolidation, irregular line, and air bronchogram sign. COVID-19 lesions showed mainly subpleural distribution, which was accompanied by bronchovascular bundle distribution in nearly 30% of the patients. The lower lobes of both lungs were the most commonly involved. In the follow-up, the progression group showed more involvement of the upper lobe of the left lung than the recovery group. GGO was the most common sign. As the disease progressed, round GGO decreased and patchy GGO increased. On follow-up CT, consolidation increased in the progression group while decreasing in the recovery group. Air bronchogram sign was more commonly observed at the initial examination (90.9%) than at follow-up (30%) in the recovery group, but there was no significant change in the progression group. Pleural effusion and lymphadenopathy were absent in the initial examination, but pleural effusion was observed in three cases after follow-up. As COVID-19 progressed, round GGOs tended to evolve into patchy GGOs, consolidation increased, and pleural effusion could be occasionally observed. As COVID-19 resolved, the crazy-paving pattern and air bronchogram significantly decreased.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
Chun-Shuang Guan and Lian-Gui Wei contributed equally to this work.
ISSN:1305-3612
1305-3825
1305-3612
DOI:10.5152/dir.2019.20176