Impact on 6-month outcomes of hospital trajectory in critically ill older patients: analysis of the ICE-CUB2 clinical trial

• Published in: Annals of intensive care Vol. 12; no. 1; p. 65
• Main Authors: Thietart, Sara, Boumendil, Ariane, Pateron, Dominique, Guidet, Bertrand, Vallet, Hélène
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cham Springer International Publishing 11.07.2022; Springer Nature B.V; SpringerOpen
• Subjects: Age groups; Anesthesiology; Clinical outcomes; Clinical trials; Critical care; Critical Care Medicine; Emergency medical care; Emergency Medicine; Functional status; Geriatrics; Hospitalization; Intensive; Intensive care; Life expectancy; Life Sciences; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Mortality; Older people; Outcome; Patient admissions; Sensitivity analysis; Functional status; Critical care; Intensive care; Outcome; Geriatrics; Geriatrics Outcome Functional status Intensive care Critical care
• ISSN: 2110-5820; 2110-5820
• DOI: 10.1186/s13613-022-01042-4

Background Little is known about the impact of hospital trajectory on survival and functional decline of older critically ill patients. We evaluate 6-month outcomes after admission to: intensive care units (ICU), intermediate care units (IMCU) or acute medical wards (AMW). Methods Data from the randomised prospective multicentre clinical trial ICE-CUB2 was secondarily analysed. Inclusion criteria were: presenting at emergency departments in critical condition; age ≥ 75 years; activity of daily living (ADL) ≥ 4; preserved nutritional status; and no active cancer. A Cox model was fitted to compare survival according to admission destination adjusting for patient characteristics. Sensitivity analysis using multiple imputation for missing data and propensity score matching were performed. Results Among 3036 patients, 1675 (55%) were women; median age was 85 [81–99] years; simplified acute physiology score (SAPS-3) 62 [55–69]; 1448 (47%) were hospitalised in an ICU, 504 in IMCU (17%), and 1084 (36%) in AMW. Six-month mortality was 629 (44%), 155 (31%) and 489 (45%) after admission in an ICU, IMCU and AMW ( p  < 0.001), respectively. In multivariate analysis, AMW admission was associated with worse 6-month survival (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.04–1.63) in comparison with IMCU admission, after adjusting for age, gender, comorbidities, ADL, SAPS-3 and diagnosis. Survival was not significantly different between patients admitted in an ICU and an IMCU (HR 1.17, 95% CI 0.95–1.46). Sensitivity analysis using multiple imputation for missing data and propensity score matching found similar results. Hospital destination was not significantly associated with the composite criterion loss of 1-point ADL or mortality. Physical and mental components of the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey were significantly lower in the acute medical ward group (34.3 [27.5–41.7], p  = 0.037 and 44.3 [38.6–48.6], p  = 0.028, respectively) than in the ICU group (34.7 [28.4–45.3] and 45.5 [40.0–50.0], respectively) and IMCU group (35.7 [29.7–43.8] and 44.5 [39.7–48.4], respectively). Conclusions Admission in an AMW was associated with worse 6-month survival in older critically ill patients in comparison with IMCU admission, with no difference of survival between ICU and IMCU admission. There were no clinically relevant differences in quality of life in each group. These results should be confirmed in specific studies and raise the question of dedicated geriatric IMCUs.