Genetic information improves the prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events in the GENEMACOR population
The inclusion of a genetic risk score (GRS) can modify the risk prediction of coronary artery disease (CAD), providing an advantage over the use of traditional models. The predictive value of the genetic information on the recurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) remains controversia...
Saved in:
Published in | Genetics and molecular biology Vol. 44; no. 2; p. e20200448 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Brazil
Sociedade Brasileira de Genética
01.01.2021
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The inclusion of a genetic risk score (GRS) can modify the risk prediction of coronary artery disease (CAD), providing an advantage over the use of traditional models. The predictive value of the genetic information on the recurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) remains controversial. A total of 33 genetic variants previously associated with CAD were genotyped in 1587 CAD patients from the GENEMACOR study. Of these, 18 variants presented an hazard ratio >1, so they were selected to construct a weighted GRS (wGRS). MACE discrimination and reclassification were evaluated by C-Statistic, Net Reclassification Index and Integrated Discrimination Improvement methodologies. After the addition of wGRS to traditional predictors, the C-index increased from 0.566 to 0.572 (p=0.0003). Subsequently, adding wGRS to traditional plus clinical risk factors, this model slightly improved from 0.620 to 0.622 but with statistical significance (p=0.004). NRI showed that 17.9% of the cohort was better reclassified when the primary model was associated with wGRS. The Kaplan-Meier estimator showed that, at 15-year follow-up, the group with a higher number of risk alleles had a significantly higher MACE occurrence (p=0.011). In CAD patients, wGRS improved MACE risk prediction, discrimination and reclassification over the conventional factors, providing better cost-effective therapeutic strategies. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that no conflict of interest could be perceived as prejudicial to the impartiality of the reported research. Authors Contributions : MIM designed and directed the study, wrote the manuscript; EH and SF performed the statistical analysis; ACS, AP, MS, MT, JM, JS and RR performed the clinical assessment and contributed to the database; SB proofread the manuscript technically; GG performed with the DNA extraction and SNPs genotyping; RPR was involved in planning and supervision of the study, discussed the results and commented on the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version. Associate Editor: Mara Hutz |
ISSN: | 1415-4757 1678-4685 1678-4685 |
DOI: | 10.1590/1678-4685-gmb-2020-0448 |