The Olfactory Cleft Endoscopy Scale correlates with olfactory metrics in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis

Background Olfactory loss affects a majority of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Traditional objective measures of disease severity, including endoscopy scales, focus upon the paranasal sinuses and often have weak correlation to olfaction. Methods Adults with CRS were prospectively evalua...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational forum of allergy & rhinology Vol. 6; no. 3; pp. 293 - 298
Main Authors Soler, Zachary M., Hyer, J. Madison, Karnezis, Tom T., Schlosser, Rodney J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.03.2016
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Olfactory loss affects a majority of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Traditional objective measures of disease severity, including endoscopy scales, focus upon the paranasal sinuses and often have weak correlation to olfaction. Methods Adults with CRS were prospectively evaluated by blinded reviewers with a novel Olfactory Cleft Endoscopy Scale (OCES) that evaluated discharge, polyps, edema, crusting, and scarring of the olfactory cleft. Objective olfactory function was assessed using “Sniffin’ Sticks” testing, including composite threshold‐discrimination‐identification (TDI) scores. Olfactory‐specific quality of life was evaluated using the short modified version of the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders (QOD‐NS). Interrater and intrarater reliability was assessed among 3 reviewers for OCES grading. Multivariate linear regression was then used to test associations between OCES scores and measures of olfaction, controlling for potential confounding factors. Results The OCES score was evaluated in 38 patients and had a high overall reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91 to 0.96). The OCES significantly correlated with objective olfaction as measured by TDI score (p < 0.001), with TDI score falling by 1.13 points for every 1‐point increase in OCES score. Similar significant associations were found for threshold, discrimination, and identification scores (p < 0.003 for all) after controlling for age, gender, race, and reviewer/review. The OCES was also highly associated with patient‐reported QOD‐NS scores (p = 0.009). Conclusion A novel olfactory cleft endoscopy scale, OCES, shows high reliability and correlates with both objective and patient‐reported olfaction in patients with CRS. Further studies to determine prognostic value and responsiveness to change are warranted.
Bibliography:istex:473D7B59F0CBFB2C3458D36E9C2FD1D6C5D9FECE
ArticleID:ALR21655
NIH - No. R03 DC013651-01
ark:/67375/WNG-2QRVBRWZ-B
Funding sources for the study: NIH (National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders [NIDCD] R03 DC013651‐01 to Z.M.S.).
Potential conflict of interest: Z.M.S. is supported for this investigation by a grant from the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD), one of the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (R03 DC013651‐01; PI: Z.M.S.); he is also a consultant for Olympus, which is not affiliated with the study reported herein. R.J.S. is supported by grants from OptiNose and IntersectENT; neither are associated with the study reported herein; he is also a consultant for Olympus and Arrinex, which are also not affiliated with this study.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2042-6976
2042-6984
DOI:10.1002/alr.21655