Gas embolism in laparoscopic hepatectomy: what is the optimal pneumoperitoneal pressure for laparoscopic major hepatectomy?

Laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) has become popular as a surgical treatment for liver diseases, and numerous recent studies indicate that it is safe and has advantages in selected patients. Because of the magnified view offered by the laparoscope under pneumoperitoneal pressure, LH results in less blee...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences Vol. 20; no. 2; pp. 137 - 140
Main Authors Otsuka, Yuichiro, Katagiri, Toshio, Ishii, Jun, Maeda, Tetsuya, Kubota, Yoshihisa, Tamura, Akira, Tsuchiya, Masaru, Kaneko, Hironori
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Japan Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.02.2013
Springer Japan
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) has become popular as a surgical treatment for liver diseases, and numerous recent studies indicate that it is safe and has advantages in selected patients. Because of the magnified view offered by the laparoscope under pneumoperitoneal pressure, LH results in less bleeding than open laparotomy. However, gas embolism is an important concern that has been discussed in the literature, and experimental studies have shown that LH is associated with a high incidence of gas embolism. Major hepatectomies are done laparoscopically in some centers, even though the risk of gas embolism is believed to be higher than for minor hepatectomy due to the wide transection plane with dissection of major hepatic veins and long operative time. At many high-volume centers, LH is performed at a pneumoperitoneal pressure less than 12 mmHg, and reports indicate that the rate of clinically severe gas embolism is low. However, more studies will be necessary to elucidate the optimal pneumoperitoneal pressure and the incidence of gas embolism during LH.
Bibliography:istex:F1C774D17177BD48FA4E53623C5A4302DD72DA1D
ark:/67375/WNG-5C2MBMV4-C
ArticleID:JHBP1982
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:1868-6974
1868-6982
DOI:10.1007/s00534-012-0556-0