Different Teams, Same Conclusions? A Systematic Review of Existing Clinical Guidelines for the Assessment and Treatment of Tinnitus in Adults

Though clinical guidelines for assessment and treatment of chronic subjective tinnitus do exist, a comprehensive review of those guidelines has not been performed. The objective of this review was to identify current clinical guidelines, and compare their recommendations for the assessment and treat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in psychology Vol. 8; p. 206
Main Authors Fuller, Thomas E, Haider, Haula F, Kikidis, Dimitris, Lapira, Alec, Mazurek, Birgit, Norena, Arnaud, Rabau, Sarah, Lardinois, Rachelle, Cederroth, Christopher R, Edvall, Niklas K, Brueggemann, Petra G, Rosing, Susanne N, Kapandais, Anestis, Lungaard, Dorte, Hoare, Derek J, Cima, Rilana F F
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 22.02.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Though clinical guidelines for assessment and treatment of chronic subjective tinnitus do exist, a comprehensive review of those guidelines has not been performed. The objective of this review was to identify current clinical guidelines, and compare their recommendations for the assessment and treatment of subjective tinnitus in adults. We systematically searched a range of sources for clinical guidelines (as defined by the Institute of Medicine, United States) for the assessment and/or treatment of subjective tinnitus in adults. No restrictions on language or year of publication were applied to guidelines. Clinical guidelines from Denmark, Germany, Sweden, The Netherlands, and the United States were included in the review. There was a high level of consistency across the guidelines with regard to recommendations for audiometric assessment, physical examination, use of a validated questionnaire(s) to assess tinnitus related distress, and referral to a psychologist when required. Cognitive behavioral treatment for tinnitus related distress, use of hearing aids in instances of hearing loss and recommendations against the use of medicines were consistent across the included guidelines. Differences between the guidelines centered on the use of imaging in assessment procedures and sound therapy as a form of treatment for tinnitus distress respectively. Given the level of commonality across tinnitus guidelines from different countries the development of a European guideline for the assessment and treatment of subjective tinnitus in adults seems feasible. This guideline would have the potential to benefit the large number of clinicians in countries where clinical guidelines do not yet exist, and would support standardization of treatment for patients across Europe.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Reviewed by: Berthold Langguth, University of Regensburg, Germany; Arata Horii, Osaka University Hospital, Japan
Edited by: Etienne De Villers-Sidani, McGill University, Canada
This article was submitted to Auditory Cognitive Neuroscience, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
These authors have contributed equally to this work.
ISSN:1664-1078
1664-1078
DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00206