Corrigendum to “Clinical and Preclinical Cognitive Function Improvement after Oral Treatment of a Botanical Composition Composed of Extracts from Scutellaria baicalensis and Acacia catechu”

• Published in: Behavioural neurology Vol. 2017; no. 2017; p. 1
• Main Authors: Brownell, Lidia, Burnett, Bruce P., Yimam, Mesfin, Jia, Qi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cairo, Egypt Hindawi Publishing Corporation 01.01.2017; Hindawi; John Wiley & Sons, Inc; Wiley
• Subjects: Clinical trials; Cognitive ability; Corrigendum
• ISSN: 0953-4180; 1875-8584; 1875-8584
• DOI: 10.1155/2017/3493086

In the article titled “Clinical and Preclinical Cognitive Function Improvement after Oral Treatment of a Botanical Composition Composed of Extracts from Scutellaria baicalensis and Acacia catechu” [1], there is an error in a sentence in the abstract section. The sentence, “In a separate human clinical trial, test subjects orally given 300 mg of UP326 BID for 30 days showed marked improvement in speed and accuracy of processing complex information in computer tasks and reduced their standard deviation of performance compared to baseline and the placebo group” should be corrected to “In a separate human clinical trial, test subjects orally given 300 mg of UP326 per day for 30 days showed marked improvement in speed and accuracy of processing complex information in computer tasks and reduced their standard deviation of performance compared to baseline and the placebo group.”