Quality of spirometry tests in the field of occupational health

• Published in: BMC research notes Vol. 17; no. 1; p. 11
• Main Authors: Alavi Foumani, Amirala, Alavi Foumani, Seyyed Ali, Attarchi, Mirsaeed, Etemadi Deilami, Alireza, Majlesi, Behzad, Ildari, Shima, Eslami-Kenarsari, Habib
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 03.01.2024; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Academic disciplines; Age; Analysis; Care and treatment; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Cough; Cross-Sectional Studies; Diagnosis; Exhalation; Females; Gender; Humans; Inhalation; Iran; Lung diseases; Medical care; Medical students; Occupational hazards; Occupational Health; Quality assessment; Quality management; Reproducibility; Research Note; Respiratory system; Respiratory tract diseases; Risk factors; Spirometry; Spirometry - methods; Thorax; Workers; Iran; Spirometry; Occupational health; Quality assessment
• ISSN: 1756-0500; 1756-0500
• DOI: 10.1186/s13104-023-06671-x

The spirometry test is a valuable test to evaluate the performance of the respiratory system. The interpretation of the results is highly dependent on the quality of its performance, while the inappropriate quality results in unwanted consequences for individuals and the healthcare system. This study investigated the quality of spirometry tests performed in occupational health. In this cross-sectional study, the quality of 776 spirometry tests in different occupational centers by the specialists in Rasht, Iran, in 2020, based on the guidelines of the American Thoracic Society (ATS), was investigated. The quality and success rate of the test and the demographical characteristics of the operators and the participants were collected. All data was analyzed using SPSS software version 20. Out of 776 spirometry tests, about 69.7% were unacceptable. Among the unacceptable tests, a pause error between inhalation and exhalation was identified in 7.4% of tests. Additionally, 4.6% of the unacceptable tests exhibited a cough error within the first second, while an exhalation error of less than six was observed in 85%. Repeatability errors were found in 60.9% of the tests. Furthermore, among some errors, the communication error between the characteristics of the technicians and the test performance errors were evident. According to the results, most of the performed tests were unacceptable with no repeatability, which indicated that the validity and quality of spirometry tests and their interpretation were inappropriate in the field of occupational health in Rasht, Iran.